User talk:Wcpew4auv

Welcome!

Hello, Wcpew4auv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was WCPE, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Removal of incorrect information"

If, as your edit summary in this edit indicates, you believe there is incorrect information in the WCPE article, please discuss the matter at Talk:WCPE, and be prepared to provide reliable sources that lead you to believe the information you've removed is incorrect. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I noticed that you recently removed content from WCPE without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at WCPE shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Again, as previously recommend, discuss the matter. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Persistently editing in violation of the conflict of interest guideline and the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use relating to paid editing, despite having been informed of them, edit warring, attempting to exert ownership over an article to prevent inclusion of information you do not wish to be seen, and misrepresenting what your editing is doing by using misleading edit summary.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If you persist in trying to control the content of the article about your business then it can be edit-protected to prevent you from doing so. However, I hope you won't choose to make that necessary, as it might cause inconvenience for some legitimate editors, as well as stopping your misuse. JBW (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]