User talk:Wbstroud

Welcome!

Hello, Wbstroud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 04:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to William Beattie Stroud

Your recent edit to William Beattie Stroud (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation of James A. Stroud

Welcome to Wikipedia! It seems pretty clear to me that your creation of and subsequent edits on James A. Stroud constitute a conflict of interest (I am assuming, from your username, that you are his son, William B. Stroud). Wikipedia strives to maintain above all a neutral viewpoint; furthermore, information on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable, which means that other editors can come along and "fact-check" the article to make sure there are no false statements in it. Because it's difficult to "fact check" when there are no published sources, many Wikipedians strive to only write articles about people who are demonstrably notable.

If you write an article about a family member, the article may start to run into the sorts of problems listen in this guideline about autobiographies. For this reason, it's generally discouraged. Looking at the James A. Stroud article, it seems like it contains a lot of unsourced original research, with some unverifiable statements. Furthermore, it's difficult to determine how notable James A. Stroud is, since the article doesn't list any books he's written or articles that have been written about him. Indeed, other editors have noted that fact, which you have deleted from the page.

Please let me know what your thoughts are on this issue. If you can't prove his notability according to the factors covered in Notability (people), then I'm going to have to nominate this article for deletion. -sthomson06 (Talk) 21:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James A. Stroud

I've nominated James A. Stroud, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that James A. Stroud satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A. Stroud and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of James A. Stroud during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -sthomson06 (Talk) 16:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James A. Stroud

I have nominated James A. Stroud, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A. Stroud (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P5230033.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P5230033.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]