User talk:Wayne shoter

Thank you

... for starting the article that currently is now BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant. Peace, rkmlai (talk) 01:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for the recognition.Wayne shoter (talk) 04:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:2009-bart-shooting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2009-bart-shooting.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Meserle-shooting.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Meserle-shooting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 06:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meserle-shooting.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meserle-shooting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 04:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikileaks Spelling

Thanks for fixing the spelling, but that article is using British spelling per our style guide and its guidelines. It's a toss-up which form is used, but whichever starts out first gets precedence, and since Assange is from Australia or some confluence of historical oddities, British spelling got their first. You can read more about it here: American_and_British_English_spelling_differences. Let me know if you have any questions, Ocaasi (talk) 08:32, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman. Zazpot (talk) 08:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wayne shoter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 5by5 Studios

The article 5by5 Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]