User talk:WayneRay

File:Hanson1963.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hanson1963.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire
Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 21:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pleasantville, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article Pleasantville, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to back up any potential notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɱ (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Gut, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article The Gut, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this entity exists, cannot find a ref. Tagged as unref'd since 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Herostratus (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wayne Ray

The article Wayne Ray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essentially unref'd BLP (vital stats are ref'd, but to an interview; interviews are not usually good refs. Notability issues (cannot find any refs good enough for a BLP). In addition, subject wrote the article, but I would think that he regrets that now. I won't explain more but if PROD refused plz notify me and it *must* go to AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Herostratus (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RBG Herbarium

The article RBG Herbarium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm afraid I can't make sense of the lead enough to try to make it more clear. It is not an article about the RBG Herbarium. A list of seeds and what appears to be the donors of the seeds does not appear notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Yes go ahead. I am putting a better photo list on Commons. Wayne Ray — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.82.30 (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wayne Ray

The article Wayne Ray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CREATIVE. Being a secretary/treasurer is not the same as having produced an important body of regularly-cited work. Also fails WP:GNG - most of the sources currently in the article fail WP:RS and/or do not cover the subject in significant detail. The only reliable sources I could find that cover the subject are along these lines [1], which makes this a textbook BLP1E.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wayne Ray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne Ray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Ray (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Poetry Association

The article Canadian Poetry Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization. A search of Google News for "Canadian Poetry Association" turns up exactly TWO hits, both brief passing mentions. Of the sources currently in the article, one is primary and the other appears to be published by a very minor press that I can't verify even exists. Article is basically advertising copy/spam which was written by one of the group's own members, Wayne Ray (talk · contribs), and later edited extensively by his sockpuppet, Haiku Tea (talk · contribs), after his first account was blocked.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 22:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unfinished Monument Press for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unfinished Monument Press is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfinished Monument Press (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Faiers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Faiers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Faiers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Plantos

The article Ted Plantos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable writer. Zero Google News hits. Article was written and almost exclusively written by WayneRay (talk · contribs) who is personally connected to the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wray toon2.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wray toon2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tracy Repchuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Repchuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Repchuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 04:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barton, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article Barton, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lockport, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article Lockport, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fits outstandingly well with the location of this mine, but a mine doesn't fit WP:GEOLAND. No indication that this was ever a notable place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lomond, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article Lomond, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osmond, Newfoundland and Labrador for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osmond, Newfoundland and Labrador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmond, Newfoundland and Labrador until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 06:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rooms, Newfoundland and Labrador

The article The Rooms, Newfoundland and Labrador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This does not seem notable. I'm unable to find any content on it. (There does appear to be some content on a museum of the same name?)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moriwen (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barr'd Harbour

The article Barr'd Harbour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources. Created in 2007.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]