User talk:WaterlooRoadForever

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Montanna Thompson, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 10:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sally Dexter. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 10:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Rebecca Ryan, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 12:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Lacey Turner. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 14:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DarkGlow OMG what on earth is your problem with me, I think you need to get some fresh air and touch some grass. (WaterlooRoadForever (talk) 14:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

DarkGlow and for yours and Ponyo's information I aint NO bloody sock puppet. Get your facts right. (WaterlooRoadForever (talk) 14:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

"Touch some grass" LMFAOOOOO... PLEASE take your own advice. It's the making of numerous accounts to repeatedly make the same tragic edits that violate guidelines for me! Worry about that before you come for me. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 14:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DarkGlow what gives you the right to treat other editors like this, learn some respect and manners. Your not the only one who's aloud to edit on here you know. (WaterlooRoadForever (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

If you tell me to "get some fresh air and touch some grass", I'm gonna respond. I don't take ownership of articles, I'm merely reverting the same tiring edits that you insist on making (which tarnish the grounds of the articles you touch). They violate guidelines. I've explained all of this in my edit summaries when I revert you. You're the one treating Wikipedia like your personal stomping ground, so don't attempt to gaslight me. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 14:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Note that I've blocked without talk page access due to your history of "I didn't hear that" appeals. I have very recently explained how your can return to editing via the standard offer, which you continue to ignore, choosing to continue to sock in defiance of your ban. WP:UTRS is available for appeals, but as I've noted multiple times, the standard offer is your only option to return to editing at this point.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 40911

UTRS appeal #40911 is now closed,

I will copy this to your talk page because it will be easier to read.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time for a number of reasons

You have not addressed the disruptive editing and incivility that occurred prior to your being blocked. MOSACCESS is important because, "web accessibility is the goal of making web pages easier to navigate and read. While this is primarily intended to assist those with disabilities, it can be helpful to all readers. " The edits that you received messages about made the pages less accessible. When DarkGlow reverted your edits and explained why they had done so, you responded rudely and in a hostile manner. You also were rude to Ponyo. This lack of civility must be addressed. Civility is one of the five pillars upon which Wikipedia is built.

You were blocked because a check user determined you were evading your block and abusing multiple accounts (sock puppetry). (You did in fact deny sock puppetry.) You have done this more than once. You will need to request unblocking via your original account. However, you were most recently (AFAIK) blocked February 25, 2021 and will not be eligible for unblock consideration until August 25, 2021.

At that time you may apply for the Standard Offer. The guidelines for the Standard Offer are simple: Wait six months without sockpuppetry or block evasion. That means no editing the English Wikipedia, under this account or any other, or without logging in, for six months. Don't create any extraordinary reasons for the Wikipedia community to object to a return. You should, however, edit other language Wikipedias or Wikimedia projects during the six months in order to show you can edit constructively. If, at the end of six months, you've adhered to these conditions, you may address the behavior that led to the block and request unblocking. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Standard_offer for full details about the Standard Offer. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]