User talk:Watchlords

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Watchlords", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 12:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Watchlords

A tag has been placed on User:Watchlords, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am One of Many (talk) 21:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Watchlords (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It addresses facts, not fictions. I expected this type of reaction by supporters of Invicta and as such have posted the page on line. Everything posted is supported by facts, documents and photos. If Wikipedia deletes this content it will reinforce what many already think, that corporations and their allies can bully regular users.

I run a watch forum and claim made is supported by verifiable facts. If I say Michael davis is a felon, the records are there. If i say he claimed to be a SEAL, the records are there. If he claims to have graduated from a college, the records are there. If Invicta sold fake sandstone dials, the records are there.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Watchlords (talk) 22:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion for the following reasons: as a page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or some other entity. This includes libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or an article about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to. See CSD G10.

because in its current form it serves only to promote an entity, person or product, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. However, the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is an article's subject does not, on its own, qualify that article for deletion under this criterion. Nor does this criterion apply where substantial encyclopedic content would remain after removing the promotional material; in this case please remove the promotional material yourself, or add the

tag to alert others to do so. See CSD G11.

There is no libel and the sources cannot be contested. The prison records are from Ohio, the Fake Seal verification from Veriseal, a well know group that verifies SEALS and other special operations people. The section about his fake resume is from him. I personally spoke with the registar at Wilminton College last week and verified that he never received a BS degree from there. These are facts, not guesses. The public has a right to know who they are dealing with.

The fake sandstone is also fact and Pacific Labs is well respected. I have already copied the original changes and if WIKI acts to delete this, I will post the original on-line along with the speedy deletion reasons. This used to be a respected site, now I am not so certain.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-davis/4/6a6/3?_mSplash=1 http://michaeldavis.brandyourself.com/

From: P.O.W. Network - Chuck and Mary Schantag [ mailto:info@pownetwork.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:49 PM To: Tom Mason Subject: Re: Michael James Davis

Are any of the claims CURRENT??

He was exposed back in 1999. At the time, SEALs did their own work. We have nothing on him but notes he was exposed back then and listed as a fraud.

Mary

Thank you for your email.

After an extensive search of our records, we find no record on Michael James Davis (DOB 6/11/1965). If you need a formal letter, provide the address where we would mail it.

Sincerely, Alma Nabhan

Office of the Registrar/ Enrollment and Veteran Certification

The University of Texas at Austin

PO Box 7216

Austin TX 78713

phone (512) 475-7540

Re: davisBack to Messages From: Liz Logan <liz.logan@> Reply To: To:"Admin@watchlords.com" <watchlords@juno.com>Cc: Bcc: Sent: Wed, Jul 06, 2011 07:36 AM

Roger that - I'll call you then. And as for him removing the pic of him with the automatic weapon - no worries - I have a copy!

Also have the name of the BATF agent we contacted in 1999 about this Mike Knight 615-781-5589 x133 BATF Knoxville

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GB fan 00:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]