User talk:Warrior on Terrorism
Welcome
[edit]
|
US Casualties of War
[edit]Thank you for updating the casualties of the Afghan war. Where are you getting your figures? I used to get them from www.defenselink.mil, but they deleted that link. Czolgolz 13:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you! I appriciate you updated figures on what's amounting to a forgotten war. Czolgolz 20:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Ho Chi Minh Trail
[edit]Howdy! Thanks for the revisions on VPA/PAVN (I was about to do that any way). As to the use of Viet Cong, I find it distressing. The name of the organization for which those men and women fought and died was the National Liberation Front, not some perjorative title imposed on them by Ngo Dinh Diem. I know, most Americans would not know the NLF if it jumped up and bit them, but I was under the impression that we were supposed to strive for historical accuracy. How would you like it if I edited the article on the American Civil War and altered every mention of the United States Army, the Union Army, or the Federal Army to, say, the "damn Yankee Army"? RM Gillespie 20:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
"Revert vandalism" on 2004-2006 Waziristan conflict
[edit]Content disputes, which is exactly what is happening on 2004-2006 Waziristan conflict cannot be considered vandalism. Further wholesale reverts of HanzoHattori's (or anyone's) good faith edits and characterizing them as vandalism may result in you being blocked from editing for a period of time for violating Wikipedia's policies of WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Since this is not vandalism, whenever you decide you do not like an edit by HanzoHattori, you must give a reason for the revert, either in the edit summary, or, if complex, on the talk page after making a note of that in the edit summary. If you do revert, you are required to re-insert any parts of the edit which are non-controversial and contribute to the article (such as wikilinking important terms, grammar and spelling corrections, and non-controversial and useful content additions). Please play fair. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]Evidence
[edit]If I may step in, I believe the "evidence" you're looking for is under the link Netsnipe provided, if you would only click on it. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 04:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject:Terrorism
[edit]Greetings,
I was hoping I could get some input from you, about the proposed mergerof Wikipedia:WikiProject Terrorism and counter-terrorism with Wikiproject:Terrorism. It seems there's a lot of overlap between the two projects, and if we spent a few days merging the lists of articles, sharing ideas and collaborating on improving the same articles which both projects are focused on improving...we could really make some headway. Whether you're in favour, or against, the idea of a merger - I'd appreciate some feedback regardless. Much thanks. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 21:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject Terrorism Newsletter
[edit]The Terrorism WikiProject April 2008 Newsletter |
||
News
| ||
Archives • Discussion |