User talk:WarriorCK9499

Problems

Re: this, which is a repeat of this edit, the content you've submitted is unsourced, dubious (since the world's a big place and I'm sure there were some US teasers that were equally or far more attractive) and it's just so promotional in tone. We're not here to promote the film. And everything is a record if you set the goalposts close enough away. "Most viewed teaser in South India released on a Tuesday between 12pm and 2:25pm.

Re: this, which is a repeat of this edit, please stop submitting duplicate wikilinks. We don't need a wikilink to a person's article every time we mention them, and we already mentioned Vijay in the first lead paragraph, not to mention he's linked to in the infobox, and in the cast section. Wikilinks compete for reader attention. You're just cluttering up the article by adding needless duplicates. Same thing here where you needlessly add a duplicate link for A. R. Rahman. Note also that WP:OVERLINK represents community consensus about the matter, so please cut it out.

And generally speaking, when changes you've made are reverted, your remedy is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for inclusion. Resubmitting the problematic changes is considered disruptive, and such behavior can result in either the article being protected so you can't edit it, or your editing privileges being revoked. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Username Kajan

Hi again, just so you know, when you signed your talk page post here on my talk page, you signed it under the username Kajan, which is obviously not your username. When you sign a post, you just need to use four tildes like this: ~~~~. If you messed around with your user preferences and changed your signature, you will need to change it back, since you can't pretend to be another user. The easiest way to do this is to go to Special:Preferences, and clear whatever formatting you have in the Signature field, then click Save at the bottom of the page. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mess

Not sure what you were intending to do, but in these three edits [1][2][3], (you can view the totality of the changes here,) you made an absolute mess of my talk page. You restored conversations that had been archived, you removed my responses to other discussions, and you signed another user's comments. You need to be very careful with your edits. I strongly urge you to use the Show Preview and Show Changes features before saving your changes to a page so you can see what the result of your changes will be. In this case if you had used Show changes, you would have seen that you were adding blocks of text to my talk page. I don't know if you're just mashing keys without any thought, but if you keep making edits like this, you're very surely going to wind up blocked to prevent damage to the encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mersal (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [4] Data like this needs to be sourced. If someone comes by in 3 months and changes the date, how are we supposed to prove what the correct information is? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this, references don't get pasted in the references section. If you edit the page, you can see that references are added at the end of each sentence, or after whatever statement is being made. The poster you added, by the way, doesn't say that the US release is 17 October. Unless I'm missing something, I just see a poster that says "Oct 17", and then there's a weird sticker that is vaguely reminiscent of the US flag. Is that what we're using to infer that the US release was 17 October? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY

Re: this, do not copy content verbatim as you did from this source. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated. Copying is intellectually lazy and dishonest. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thalapathy 62, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I decided to remove the content that I removed because I said that a specific event was supposed to happen in 'early March', but that time has now passed, and the team of 'Thalapathy 62' are not 'heading to the US' in the time that was previously planned. This was why I decided to remove the sentence, and it was also added by myself in the first place. This is my reason for removing the sentence. If you do not agree, I understand and I will leave to you without forcing any further. Thank you. WarriorCK9499 (talk) 14:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Bagged"?

Stop adding problematic content like this. "Bagged" is not proper tone for an encyclopedia and that phrasing is almost certainly just lifted from other articles you've read. Also, Wikipedia doesn't care about satellite rights sales. This was discussed at WT:ICTF. Search the discussion archives. We're not here to track every dollar the film made. Nobody cares that Avengers End Game will someday be shown on HBO or whatever and that money was exchanged for the privilege. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am still in the process of learning how to use Wikipedia. Hence why I make mistakes at times. I apologise for that. 18:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bigil, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Begoon 13:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Begoon 13:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalapathy 64 (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need at least 3 independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thalapathy 64 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thalapathy 64, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Singappenney, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thalapathy 64 (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A bit too off in the future and all the sources are pretty much press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thalapathy 64 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thalapathy 64, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 14:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WarriorCK9499! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 14:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bigil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

bigil 300 crore 17 days collection times of india update source

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/bigil-box-office-update-vijays-sports-drama-collects-rs-300-in-17-days/articleshow/72007931.cms Singhtejass (talk) 13:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong URL

FYI, this was not the right URL. I have fixed it for you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]