User talk:Warholtodiefor

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Warholtodiefor (talk · contribs) has been paid by Revolver Gallery. COI declared on their Userpage.

Since 2017, I have been employed as an unpaid intern for Revolver Gallery, Santa Monica, CA. I have been paid to contribute to a factual article on Revolver Gallery. I have striven to uphold the standard of neutrality set by Wikipedia within my contributions, and have thoroughly cited the article. -WarholtodieforWarholtodiefor (talk) 03:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warholtodiefor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Warholtodiefor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolver Gallery (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm going to have to share Primefac's concerns here.

You may also take a look at User:Joe Decker/IsThisNotable. I'm still working on refining it, but my hope is to provide a more step-by-step (if still not simple) approach to explaining what we need in terms of demonstrating notability. I hope that it will be helpful.

Once you've read that, and discounted many of the references here which are press releases or barely warmed over press releases, what we're left with still doesn't include any articles which provide in-depth information about the gallery.

I am very open to the idea that Revovler might meet our criteria, but the current references don't provide evidence that it does.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Revolver Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 19:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revolver Gallery has been accepted

Revolver Gallery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JSFarman (talk) 02:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]