User talk:Warfwar3

This user may have left Wikipedia. Warfwar3 has not edited Wikipedia since April 25, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Pakistan have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove warnings

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page as this is considered to be vandalism.--Andeh 15:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some tools to help you edit better come with the welcome--

Welcome!

Hello, Warfwar3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need help?

I'll help out. What do you need help with? Hurricanehink (talk) 01:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a new englander?

Are youa new englander?

Is that to me? Well, I'm from New Jersey. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flooding?

Did you know about the heave flooding in Massachusetts a couple of weeks ago?

No. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't sure what more you wanted. I am from New Jersey, and I don't know about the flooding in New England. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks anyway

What's up?

You sounded the helpme siren? What's up? -- cds^(talk) 01:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure

I was to talkning to another user and he just kinda left.

Anyway

Are youa new englander?

How can I help you?

- CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well

Youa are the third person I have started talking to in about 5 minutes. Are youa NEw Englander?

No :) I live in Jersey. Do you actually have a question - or are you tying up the 911 emergency line for no reason? :) :) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, be that way

OK I GIVE UP GOOD NIGHT

NO NO

I actually do have a question. HAve you heard about the flodding in MA two weeks ago?

TYING UP THE 911 LINES!!?

Have you noticed that i am the only person on there

I GIVE UP, I'm going to bed.

All I wanted to say was that someone should expand on the article about MAy 2006 flooding of NEw England. New England Flooding May 2006

Lol. I was kidding about the 911 lines. You can go ahead and add an {{expand}} tag to the top of that article, and state your reasons for doing so on the talk page. That's the way to go. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is too fresh of a story to be in an encyclopedia. It belongs in wikinews for now. You can go there and add to the coverage. Here's a link: [1]. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response to help request

You placed {{tl:help me}} on your talk page briefly. If this was an accident or you found out the answer to your question yourself you may disregard this. If you still need help, please put the {{tl:help me}} back and say what your question is. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 23:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.) Tangot a ngo 15:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

club penguin

I was concerned about the CLub PEnguin issue

You'll have to be more specific. What do you need help with? - Tangot a ngo 15:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had heard about Club Penguin (its an online thing like RunEscape and decided to search for it. However, I found that there is a huge debate going on over the undeletion of the article. Isn't wikipedia supposed to be unbaised? The person who deleted it claimed it was because he hated the game.

It went through the AFD process here and was unanimously deleted, it has been recreated since and in line with the speedy deletion criteria been deleted as a recreation. However this is not what the {{helpme}} system is for, it is for general editing questions. --pgk^(talk) 15:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you finished with User:Warfwar3/Club Penguin? Some anon's started to make nonsensical edits to it - user subpages can still be found on Google. If you're not planning on working on it to turn it into an encyclopaedia article, it should be deleted. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi. I must admit that I am confused by some of your recent edits to Thrasybulus, which is today's featured article. First, I do not know what Club Penguin has to do with this article. Second, why would you nominate the featured article for deletion? While I am willing to assume you are doing these things for a reason, these edits could be considered vandalism. Please stop and explain your edits before continuing. Thank you. EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 21:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ClubPenguin.com

I have deleted this page. As it was deleted at AfD and its deletion endorsed at DRV, it should not be recreated unless you go to WP:DRV, present them with the updated version (before movomg it) and get a consensus that the result should be overturned.

I will assume that recreating the page at ClubPenguin.com was done in good faith and not just an attempt to evade the protection on Club Penguin - this time.

If you want to take the latest version back to WP:DRV I will restore it to your userspace. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can u plz restore it to my userspace. I would like u to know that the article was copied from www.answers.com, and I then improved it. The article does have potential, so plz do not judge it based on the older version from wikipedia.Warfwar3

Restored to the same place as before. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 18:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine

I want to take it to the review. By the way, the neew version was taken from answers.com

Category:Articles with large trivia sections

Hello Warfwar3. I'm a little bit confused. Why does Category:Articles with large trivia sections need cleanup? Thanks in advance. - Zepheus (ツィフィアス) 02:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im also confused

How did my username get there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warfwar3 (talk • contribs)

I'm now wondering how that happened myself. - Zepheus (ツィフィアス) 16:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag. How may I help you? When you've asked your question, please put the tag back so we know to check back. Alternatively, you can join the Wikipedia Bootcamp IRC channel to get real-time help. (Use the web-based client to get instant access.) Tangot a ngo 16:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

backlog tag on WSS/ST

What backlog is this edit referring to? I'm not aware of any on that page. Alai 16:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NORTH ANDOVER?

Does it really matter where I am from? Judging from your talk page, it seems you are seeking one who is from your local area. I am afraid that I am not at liberty to discuss my whereabouts, although you can be sure that I have first-hand knowledge of what goes on around North Andover, Massachusetts ;) Delta 20:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Club Penguin DRV

Hello, you should post your opinion of the Club Penguin deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 August 15, not start a new review. ~ trialsanderrors 04:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Club Penguin

If you want to contribute to the current (third) deletion debate you can do so here. Please remember this is about WP:NPOV, WP:Verify, WP:OR and WP:WEB mainly, not about how "cool" CP is. It is also not a poll, so, while you can record a view, don't expect it to carry weight against evidence. What would be useful is

Mainstream reviews of CP.
Verifiable data.

Rich Farmbrough 09:48 21 August 2006 (GMT).

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Ann Coulter. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 20:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Red link) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --ArmadilloFromHell 22:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

welcome to wikipedia??

User:Warfwar3|Warfwar3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warfwar3 (talk • contribs)

IAMV

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as IAMV, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iamv.org/about.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:IAMV. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:IAMV where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:IAMV.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! -- ReyBrujo 21:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted for the third time. Please stop recreating it. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IAMVYG

The article IAMVYG has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- ReyBrujo 02:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article IAMV, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review.

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as IAMV, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Death and state funeral of Gerald Ford

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Death and state funeral of Gerald Ford. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 04:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Future Human Evolution

A tag has been placed on Future Human Evolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 23:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Future Human Evolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ...adam... ^{(talk • contributions)} 23:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you believe the deletion was not justified, please see Wikipedia:Deletion review instead of just recreating the article. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 23:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just start an article with hang on - that void's the entire CSD process. You have had that page created and deleted a number of times now - and all for the same reasons. Please read WP:NOT (especially the crystal ball original research sections) and WP:OR. Even if the hangon tag had remained, the admins would not have allowed it to stay. Sorry, until it's in some real scientific journals or the news it's just not suitable ...adam... ^{(talk • contributions)} 23:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Elaz

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Sara Elaz) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Madman bum and angel 00:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Thanks for experimenting with the page George Washington on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Madman bum and angel 00:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. —Cryptic 00:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Warfwar3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What did I do?

Decline reason:

Besides the long string of vandalism and nonsense edits? Kuru ^talk 00:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just to tell you... you were blocked because you made edits that were considered vandalism. They were unproductive and introduced false information. Unless you can sincerely defend each and every change here, and in several other edits, you are blocked for 48 hours and may freely contribute (productively!) when that time has elapsed. You have already made some helpful changes; please make others soon. Gracenotes ^T § 00:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of 11 May

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kablammo 01:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sexualization of culture, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. mcr616 _Speak! 21:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sex, you will be blocked from editing. mcr616 _Speak! 22:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How was that vandalism?Warfwar3

Adding a sexualization link on a page not about the act of sex, but on a page about genders, would be considered vandalism. mcr616 _Speak! 22:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well that page also had links to human sexuality and age of consent22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I require assistance

User:Warfwar3/Club Penguin

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article User:Warfwar3/Club Penguin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Warfwar3/Club Penguin|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Kesh 00:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks at Talk:Atheism

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Wikipedia is not a forum to voice your personal opinions, unless they are with respect to improving article content. If you would like to voice your opinions, create an account with a social site such as MySpace or LiveJournal. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-06-19 19:32Z

Thanks

Thanks for the note on my talk page. Note that I don't see this as an issue of atheists vs. religious people. Some atheists have agreed with us on the dispute.

However, I do find the other atheists' behavior to be exceptionally ironic. They accuse religious people of relying on blind faith, yet they have complete trust in a study in an obscure magazine they've never seen. Their views are as "fundamentalist" and intolerant as those of the worst religious extremist. And while they claim atheists are smarter than religious people, they don't seem to understand what peer review is or why a second-hand citation of an unknown author in a non-peer-reviewed magazine is not acceptable. -- Mwalcoff 23:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of North Andover Middle School

North Andover Middle School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that North Andover Middle School satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Andover Middle School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of North Andover Middle School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ⁮şœśэїŝәқι^{ￆṱᾅἻқￂ} 18:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Elizabeth Lee

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Lee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

(I actually used to live in N.Andover, and went to NAMS, but really, you shouldn't create a article on specific people in the school) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I graduated NSMS in 2006 (had to move cause company parents worked at was outsourcing). Also, I really don't see a point arguing the CsD on Elizabeth Lee, it doesn't establish notability for a article on its own, perhaps mention in a NS Orchestra page, but not one on mainspace. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments

You may want to read and add your comments at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Homeopathy_2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.59.100 (talk) 09:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably an IP sock of the banned user Dr.Jhingaadey (talk · contribs). Verbal chat 09:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]