User talk:War wizard90/Archives/2015/January

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Orduin. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gillie and Marc, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 00:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Good Night

Como sabras, mi idioma nativo es el español, y no hablo muy bien el ingles, por ello quisiera preguntarte si podrías ayudarme con la edición de Chaza, la original está en [[1]].

Thanks you for helpme. ~~Jhon estrada — Preceding undated comment added 03:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

@Jhon estrada: Yo no hablo español, así que no estoy en condiciones de ayudarle con traducir o editar el artículo en español. War wizard90 (talk) 03:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)|

Gillie and Marc notability

Hi, I am wondering whether a page you reviewed, Gillie and Marc, now meets notability criteria? I have added more diverse sources in line with the suggestions. They are known within Australia (but perhaps not so much overseas). Thank you for your help! Emca91 (talk) 04:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

@Emca91: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I believe that the artists most likely are notable, but I am not a subject expert on this and so I am not 100% sure it meets notability requirements. I would leave the tag for another week or so, and if no one has any issues at that point remove the tag. If you want more specific info. on what is required for Creative Professionals to be considered notable, see Notability requirements for Creative Professionals. If you feel the references you have added meet those requirements feel free to remove the tag at anytime, just make sure you note why you are removing the tag in the edit summary. If no one else challenges the notability then you are good to go. However, if another editor feels it does not meet the requirements they could re-tag it or nominate the article for deletion. War wizard90 (talk) 04:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

@War wizard90: Thank you so much for explaining that to me so clearly, I really appreciate it! I will follow your advice. Emca91 (talk) 05:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

NextSociety

Why did yu mark it for deletion, I followed the guidelines. Please be more specific. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyscoNYC (talk • contribs) 14:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Anne F. Walker

Hi and thank you for your comment on the article about Anne F. Walker. I made a few changes to the article and I am still in the process of doing more so that it won't be deleted. I am not affiliated with Anne Walker but this is my first article and it is a bit of obstacle to complete the requirements as well as what's necessary and important. She is a notable poet and author, I just need to get that across. Also I would like to add a table and a picture but I am still adapting to the coding process. I did make a few changes to the external links and some of the text format. Please allow the site to remain with Wikipedia and any advice to keep it there would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WritersCraftHNU (talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RJG Inc. Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RJG Inc. Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Thanks, I actually realized this image was too large for non-free use and uploaded a smaller version for use in the article. I left a message on the talk page of the image letting the admins know as much. War wizard90 (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

And now I just realized you can just upload a new version of the image and keep the same name, I rarely upload images, so I didn't realize that, now I'll know for next time. War wizard90 (talk) 00:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Telecomunications Expense Management

I see that the page that I just put up is up for deletion due to possibly copyright infringement and "inappropriate for a variety of reasons" This is the first page that I have ever started from scratch and I am doing so at the request of a friend of mine who found the link from this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audit_%28telecommunication%29#Critical_Steps with a internal redirect to "Telecom Expense management" to be completely wrong for a redirect from something about Telecommunications. As for any copyright or information shared it is from the reference website but changed to be more generic to the topic. And I was given permission to use the information off their website for the building of this page. Again this is the first time that I have built a page from scratch and would appreciate any direction that you give me on how to fix anything that may be wrong with it. SGMJonathan (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

@SGMJonathan: Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that only has notable articles on subjects that have been proven notable with secondary sources. It is not to be used for advertisement. As for the copyright infringement, you stating that you have permission is not enough, the owner of the material has to send in a release to Wikipedia clearly stating that it can be used and proving they are the copyright owner. I recommend you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies before creating any new articles. Help for new editors can be found at the teahouse. War wizard90 (talk) 01:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

War wizard90 I am sorry if it is coming off that it looks like this is for advertisement purposes. That is not the intent. It is simply that following the redirect for the page that I sited takes you to a page about expense management which is completely different from Telecommunications Expense Management. And the information that is included in the new page is simply to show that difference. Thank you very much for the correction and I will get the release of the information from that website. But thank you for being patient with me and for the good advice on where to go for help on page building. SGMJonathan (talk) 02:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Removed contentious BLP material for USML, based on close at DRN - Peter Swirski

Below please find the Employee Profile of Peter Swirski in UMSL for your reference. If necessary, can be verified with UMSL

FULL NAME: Peter Swirski TITLE: Pro. Adjunct HIRE DATE: 01/01/2010 TYPE: Faculty DEPARTMENT: English

he left the English Department, UMSL in November 2014, he is granted the permission to use UMSL email till 05/27/2015.

Seriabrunei (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 14 January, 2015

@Seriabrunei:Unfortunately you telling me he went there is considered original research and cannot be used by Wikipedia. Furthermore, I did not decide it should be removed, it was decided via a dispute resolution discussion, found hereWar wizard90 (talk) 04:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Legacypac. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Helloworld.com.au, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 09:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

@Legacypac: I've undeleted this article and let the admin know. If you want to talk to me about it please feel free to talk to me on my talk page. I'll be doing more minor editing but I don't think it required more than a small edit to be rectified in the first place. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:58, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

(I would point out that there is a case for deleting this the normal way, so someone might want to get on that) Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Financial astrology

I really don't recommend clicking that link unless you want your day ruined, but I thought you would appreciate this gem I dug up: A 2007 study by the The British Association for the Advancement of Science conducted an experiment wherein a financial astrology, professional investor, and five year old child, were asked to invest £5,000 on the FTSE100. The child earned the most money, with the financial astrologer taking the heaviest losses. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

@Panyd: I'm not sure which link you're referring to, however, that quote is hilarious, if not unsurprising. I'm constantly amazed that in this day and age so many people still subscribe to such ridiculous phenomena, they can't take a few minutes to look at the science that completely disproves their unfounded beliefs. I guess at the core of it, people just don't like to admit that something they thought their entire lives was wrong. -War wizard90 (talk) 23:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Cloudbuilt

Hey man, So like i think there is something i don't understand here. Like I didn't see anything at all, about the game in wikipedia. I tried to find the general information you would have on a game like this.

Like, the main questions, I had about the game were-

What type of game is it? how many copies did it sell? (i didn't find this). What was the critic score? It looks like other games, what is that design called? Whats the story/point of the game? How many levels are there? What are the basic game concepts?

I tried to find all of this and it took a while to find it. I'm all for changing things, but kind of sucks to have it all deleted, i spent like 6 hours today trying to find this stuff, rewording my thoughts to use nomenclature/phrases from metacritic people/steam reviews/ign reviews, and make sure I kept all the references so its verifiable. I tried to make it as encyclopedic as i could. I still want to work on formatting it to be like other wiki pages and stuff in the future, but i need to spend a few more hours looking at other wiki pages to get there. please be kind and help me to get this up to wiki standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ztokdo (talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ztokdo: I would goto the article's talk page and ask the admin to move the article into your personal sandbox, that way you can work on the article without fear of it being deleted and get it up to par so it meets Wikipedia's requirements. Also, just because I nominated the article for deletion does not necessarily mean the deleting administrator will agree with me, and they may decide to decline the speedy deletion. However, I should point out that very few of the article's I nominate for deletion are declined, because I try to be diligent about only tagging articles that fit the criteria for deletion. If you need help get this article up to par, you can ask for help at the Teahouse, a place for editors to ask questions and get help. Let me know if I can help with anything else. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Wizard90,

I am a new wiki user who wrote an short bio for Mar Van Mourick. I read your message today and saw that there were problems on my citations. I am really appreciated for the problem you pointed out. I was wondering if I could keep my work for a few days for me to renew my citations as I am still learning to cite correctly, but I wont be able to edit it until this Thursday. Will it be okay if I start to correct on that day with no punishment?

Thanks, Selectadvusors2121 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selectadvisors2121 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Revised Mark Van Mourick

Hi,

I an the user Selectadvisors2121, who created the bio for Mark Van Mourick. I have changed all the resources with reliable resources with no broken nor dropbox link. As a new user to Wiki, I am not really sure if these good to keep my first wiki. Could you please take your time to check it again and let me know if there is anything I could do to keep it? I am really appreciated for your help. PS. I am not really sure if this is a correct format to chat with you from Wiki, please forgive me if this letter looks not professional. Thanks, Selectadvisors2121 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selectadvisors2121 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Financial astrology

I really don't recommend clicking that link unless you want your day ruined, but I thought you would appreciate this gem I dug up: A 2007 study by the The British Association for the Advancement of Science conducted an experiment wherein a financial astrology, professional investor, and five year old child, were asked to invest £5,000 on the FTSE100. The child earned the most money, with the financial astrologer taking the heaviest losses. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

@Panyd: I'm not sure which link you're referring to, however, that quote is hilarious, if not unsurprising. I'm constantly amazed that in this day and age so many people still subscribe to such ridiculous phenomena, they can't take a few minutes to look at the science that completely disproves their unfounded beliefs. I guess at the core of it, people just don't like to admit that something they thought their entire lives was wrong. -War wizard90 (talk) 23:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Cloudbuilt

Hey man, So like i think there is something i don't understand here. Like I didn't see anything at all, about the game in wikipedia. I tried to find the general information you would have on a game like this.

Like, the main questions, I had about the game were-

What type of game is it? how many copies did it sell? (i didn't find this). What was the critic score? It looks like other games, what is that design called? Whats the story/point of the game? How many levels are there? What are the basic game concepts?

I tried to find all of this and it took a while to find it. I'm all for changing things, but kind of sucks to have it all deleted, i spent like 6 hours today trying to find this stuff, rewording my thoughts to use nomenclature/phrases from metacritic people/steam reviews/ign reviews, and make sure I kept all the references so its verifiable. I tried to make it as encyclopedic as i could. I still want to work on formatting it to be like other wiki pages and stuff in the future, but i need to spend a few more hours looking at other wiki pages to get there. please be kind and help me to get this up to wiki standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ztokdo (talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ztokdo: I would goto the article's talk page and ask the admin to move the article into your personal sandbox, that way you can work on the article without fear of it being deleted and get it up to par so it meets Wikipedia's requirements. Also, just because I nominated the article for deletion does not necessarily mean the deleting administrator will agree with me, and they may decide to decline the speedy deletion. However, I should point out that very few of the article's I nominate for deletion are declined, because I try to be diligent about only tagging articles that fit the criteria for deletion. If you need help get this article up to par, you can ask for help at the Teahouse, a place for editors to ask questions and get help. Let me know if I can help with anything else. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Wizard90,

I am a new wiki user who wrote an short bio for Mar Van Mourick. I read your message today and saw that there were problems on my citations. I am really appreciated for the problem you pointed out. I was wondering if I could keep my work for a few days for me to renew my citations as I am still learning to cite correctly, but I wont be able to edit it until this Thursday. Will it be okay if I start to correct on that day with no punishment?

Thanks, Selectadvusors2121 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selectadvisors2121 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Revised Mark Van Mourick

Hi,

I an the user Selectadvisors2121, who created the bio for Mark Van Mourick. I have changed all the resources with reliable resources with no broken nor dropbox link. As a new user to Wiki, I am not really sure if these good to keep my first wiki. Could you please take your time to check it again and let me know if there is anything I could do to keep it? I am really appreciated for your help. PS. I am not really sure if this is a correct format to chat with you from Wiki, please forgive me if this letter looks not professional. Thanks, Selectadvisors2121 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selectadvisors2121 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the tag and deletion which make me be lazy to contribute anymore in English Wikipedia. Let me work it for a week, because I couldn't finish it for a day. I also want other Indonesian people to contribute for it. Anbu (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Anbu: You can work on articles without fear of deletion in your Sandbox, and when the article meets Wikipedia's criteria, you can move it into the article namespace. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

List of members..

As far as I can tell these are indirect copies of the EnWP; the frap never seems to have had such an article, and the site given is a enWP mirror. This sort of revers copyvio is actually quite common. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

@DGG: Yeah I saw your edit summary, I didn't realize it was a mirror, and the same article was deleted by another admin. yesterday so I assumed that they found it to be in violation, I'll have to be more careful in the future. Although, the original editor wasn't doing themselves any favors by removing the copyvio and speedy tags. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Christine Wiedinmyer

I have declined your speedy deletion of Christine Wiedinmyer. Even if the article itself doesn't assert a claim to notability (I'd judge this case as borderline, depending on whether you believe developing a fire emissions model to be a credible claim or not), it's still a good idea to search the web for coverage. In this case, Wiedinmyer has been covered in multiple sources, including Science, TIME, NASA, and Scientific American. At the very least A7 does not apply. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

@Altamel: Thanks, I'll wait a few days too see if any reliable sources are added to the article, if not I'll Prod it, and see what happens. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I'll be working on the article tomorrow, so hopefully that won't be necessary :) Altamel (talk) 05:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Plaza 8

Is there something wrong with Plaza 8? Asher Heimermann (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

@Asher Heimermann: No, it's fine now, but another user tagged it for speedy deletion before you had a chance to add references. That user tagged the article too quickly in my opinion, and I left them a message as well saying as much. However, in the future if you create the article in your userspace, such as your Sandbox, you can create the entire article with references and then move into the article space without fear of the page being deleted. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:KnowBe4

I have reverted your good faith edit to the speedy deletion tag on Draft:KnowBe4. It could be that the author wishes to work on the article, which is fine. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@JMHamo: Perhaps, I don't usually deal in AfC, however, since it was an IP and not the original editor's account that removed it, and because there was no edit summary, I decided to restore it. At the very least should get some sort of confirmation that they plan to work on it. -War wizard90 (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)