User talk:Wantley

Welcome!

Hello, Wantley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Top of the Pops may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the 1976 BBC reruns shown in 2011, the BBC produced a special programme, "The Story Of 1976" <ref>{{http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00zwrn7|title=Top of the Pops: the Story of 1976|accessdate=9
bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00zwrn7|title=Top of the Pops: the Story of 1976|accessdate=9 September 2014))</ref>. The have produced a similar programme prior to subsequent annual reruns.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Top of the Pops may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Pan's People]] in April 1968 when the BBC were looking for an exclusive set of dancers. <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/totp2/trivia/pans_people/|title=Pan's People]</ref> Only shortly after the start of the Pan's People era did the presence of the groups of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Top of the Pops may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<b>First performance: </b> 4th April 1968 - Dancing to [[Simon Says (1910 Fruitgum Company song|Simon Says]] by [[1910 Fruitgum Company]] (as a three-piece)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Top of the Pops

added links pointing to Lulu, The Four Seasons, Boy Meets Girl and Wild Cherry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gonks Go Beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lulu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beat Girls (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beat Girls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wantley, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wantley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beat Girls

Hello, Wantley. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Beat Girls".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legs & Co., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ATV and The Real Thing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moef Ga Ga

Dear Wantley, You might find this Commons Category interesting. But perhaps you've seen all photographs already. Vysotsky (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vysotsky, viewing your uploads with interest and will update where I know something for sure. If you manage to find anything on the GoJos or Pan's People please let me know...Wantley (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Much better photographs from Moef Ga Ga recordings can be found here, but most interesting ones can not be transferred to Commons due to copyright reasons. I can however upload this one to Commons, if you are interested. Vysotsky (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pan's People: two more here, but they are almost identical to the 3rd, already in Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 11:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your selected removal of crucial facts

On "Colony of Virginia" you removed the following cited information

"While the southern frontier established by this treaty (south of the James) remained in force for over half a century, the York river line on the north barely held 3 years before colonists began moving into the two more northerly peninsulae, encountering competition from the local tribes. Deeds of sale by the weroances exist for some, but not all of the areas in this region."

This is not only well known and accurate, it was cited to Helen Rountree, the most reliable authority. You gave no pretext or motive for whitewashing this crucial info, so I expect you to restore it. 172.56.34.254 (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anglo-Powhatan Wars into Colony of Virginia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pan's People

Dear Wantley, You might find this Commons category interesting. The source has 13 pictures more. Best regards, Vysotsky (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vysotsky Wantley (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One (related image?) more (latest, I guess): Girls with Stens. Vysotsky (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vysotsky - I'm not sure the sten gun/car pictures feature the Beat Girls - I don't recognise any of them, though the line up was always fluid. Wantley (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They seem to be part of the group in this photo (in the windows!). Vysotsky (talk) 07:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've never managed to match the women in the car with the (undoubted) Beat Girls dancing with Love Affair/Manfred Mann (you get a very good look at the Beat Girls in the Love affair youtube vid, with Sten Guns again), so I'm not sure they are actually Beat Girls. But I'll have a closer look at the available pictures. Also your caption mentions Manfred Mann - I can't recognise any band members in that picture or any others with the car. I'm guessing the car was used in another performance Wantley (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're right. The captions were taken from the original source (Dutch National Archives), who sometimes just use one caption for several photos from the same scene (in this case: the dance with Manfred Mann five minutes earlier). Vysotsky (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vysotsky. It looks like 'Pistolen Paultje' and the car were a regular feature on Moef Ga Ga, I guess his piece on the show used the leather jackets and the guns, where their use makes sense; then the jackets and guns were also used by the Beat Girls for one of their performances as they were available. The young people in the car (just realised they are all women) look maybe too much the part to be just crew or passers by, so I guess they were actresses. Wantley (talk) 08:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Football

Different sources offer alternative dates for club foundation dates, and therefore given dates can vary. Reasons for differentiation include:

Clubs can form from informal teams; clubs may include this informal period as part of their history. Examples are Notts County, resulting in dates of 1862 and 1864 being given in different sources, and West Bromwich Albion with dates of 1878 and 1879.
Clubs can form from a merger of two clubs with the date of one of the origin clubs being used as the foundation date; an example is Watford FC which underwent a merger in 1898, with one of the merged clubs being founded in 1881. In contrast other clubs use the date of merger, for example Rotherham United, with the club giving its formation date as 1925 although one of its founder clubs dates from 1870.
Some clubs were wound up (for example Stoke in 1908), with a present club claiming themselves as the continuation of the previous club.
Historicity - some dates are based on non-contemporary accounts (for example Chesterfield FC with the 1867 date based on much later accounts), or on newspaper reports where the direct connection to modern day clubs is not established.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qUOIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT104&lpg=PT104&dq=wolverhampton+wanderers+merged+1879&source=bl&ots=ycdN7Mc9zm&sig=0RJTf3vJ82PHKfEoOhLXrKB_Gak&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwinz7bupMDWAhUkD5oKHVDFBzMQ6AEIXzAM#v=onepage&q=wolverhampton%20wanderers%20merged%201879&f=false

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wantley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wantley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]