User talk:Wantednewlook

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Wantednewlook! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini 02:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Welcome!

Welcome to wikipedia, Wantednewlook. I hope that we can work together to improve the articles where we have conflicting points of view, and suggest that as a newbie, you pay special attention to WP:AGF. The principle laid out there helps us all be more constructive when dealing with people who disagree with us on issues. --JereKrischel 10:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not delete sourced material from articles on the wikipedia. Doing this may be considered vandalism. futurebird 16:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps uou have a copy of Jensen's book on hand & can cite page numbers in the Race and Intelligence (explanations) article Coatchecker

Consensus

Just bear in mind that "delete as per consensus" can only make any sense when there is a consensus to delete either present or emerging. I've also never heard the claim that Arabs are Caucasian before, since they're normally said to be Semitic. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on my Talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]