User talk:WaltCip/Archives/2023/June

This is an archive of past discussions about User:WaltCip. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Scottywong case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Well, I hope the people who were screaming that Scottywong drove a contributor off the project are now eating some boiled crow. I doubt it, though. Cheers, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 19:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your statement that Only CUs are aware of ... which LTA it was, please see Special:Diff/1158885887. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for mentioning that to me. When I checked up on the block initially, the CUs were keeping mum on who it was. I'm glad to see more information available. Cheers, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 23:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The In The News Barnstar
		For being one of the best I've seen on WP:ITN/C, I hereby award you the In the News barnstar. Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 18:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)