User talk:Walor/archive

HTML

the only HTML code i am adding is <br clear=all>, and it is for templates. i have fellow Wikipedian Azumanga1 helping me in this. don't worry. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 00:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. not like i care too much about it. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 03:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

What content am I deleting? You mean the note about who was a Rosenfeld/Conacher winner and who wasn't (I was the first one to add that by the way)? That can easily be adapted into the table. I am also willing to go to WP:RFC, so we'd best work something out. I'll readd the stars for past winners if it means that much to you. And as for the colour, I added colour in the original version because I wanted the winners of the Rosenfeld/Conacher trophies to be easily distinguishable and the current star system doesn't really stand out. The current colouring is how many single line lists are done because it is easier to read. -- Scorpion 01:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What was so bad about the edits the other editor made? Would you object to reverting back to the table before those edits were made? -- Scorpion 02:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Maher at Calgary Flames

Actually, the importance of the Foster Hewitt Memorial Award is not my POV. Its importance is defined by the fact that the Hockey Hall of Fame itself makes mention of it. That the NHL makes mention of it, and that most publications talking about any year's hall of fame make mention of it. I am reverting your removal one more time, and adding a request at both the talk page at Calgary Flames, and at WP:HOCKEY for others to weigh in. I ask, and expect, that you will respect the consensus of the community. Resolute 16:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And your personal opinion that Maher should not be included is also just that, a personal opinion. It is likewise not fact. Given we have conflicting opinions, it is appropriate to have the community decide. Resolute 17:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the information on a curse of the Hockey Team, Toronto Maple Leafs deleted?

Good day. I am going to ask you why you have removed the bit I added about the possibility of a curse on the Toronto Maple Leafs. How is it violating Wikipedia rules? You directed me to a page of what Wikipedia "is not". I did not read anything in there claiming you can not mention the possibility or appearance of a curse. What I sumbitted is mentioning the possibility of a curse. Not claiming it. I am wondering if this is an error? Would you like me to instead create a new Wikipedia article about the Curse and add it to the Sports-Related Curses section instead of the Toronto Maple Leafs page?

Thank You. Mr Canada 06:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please double check what you revert. In this instance the revision you reverted was somewhat serious vandalism, attacking a living person. Thanks, Mak (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bavaria and reverting

Try not to be too quick on the reverts. 65.96.29.235 (talk • contribs • WHOIS) was inexpertly trying to revert the bad edits by 90.186.219.91 (talk • contribs • WHOIS), but you then reinstated the bad edits. I try to go back in the history until I know the correct point to revert back to. It sometimes is difficult, especially as the last several edits might be bad! Shenme 03:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Walor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 13:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Coral High School

Just a heads-up to let you know that the article for Cape Coral High School that you nominated for deletion appears to have been improved quite a bit since you tagged it. Please take another look. I would guess it won't qualify for deletion at this point. - Itsfullofstars 02:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanks for fixing this mistake of mine. I can't remember the logic behind my edit at this point, but there was apparently a flaw in it somewhere. --Wafulz 05:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I am a bit surprised by the tenor of your approach. Thanks for going back and working on reverting vandalism. Of course, this is all I was also trying to do. I went back and looked more carefully at it thanks to your advice. You might want to consider a less accusatory tone when working with others. Anyways, have a good day and happy editing. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 23:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was Hap Day really not GM?

I'm confused ... a lot of articles on the Maple Leafs say that Day was merely assistant GM, but his Hockey Hall of Fame plaque (viewable here says he was GM during the 1957-58 season. I'd have raised this on the Talk page before, but I thought the HHOF was authoritative enough that I could just be bold. Where's the conflict? Maybe it's my perspective from a guy in a non-traditional market, but I don't understand.Blueboy96 15:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Summerholiday.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Summerholiday.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links

Somehow, all of your edits are wrecking the interwiki links in every article. How is that happening? You need to stop until that is fixed. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. As long as you're aware, carry on.

—Wknight94 (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts of Djsasso

Would you mind explaining the reasoning for the mass reverts? Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 22:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Fairweather Low

The name of the main article (as above) has now moved to reflect the lack of a hyphen.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 11:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Walor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 222 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tuffy Knight - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Daniel Brabant - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piltdown Nutsack

The article Piltdown Nutsack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

vandalism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Auntie E. (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]