User talk:Wally Otto

'Melbourne Talk Radio' is owned by Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd, which has not given permission to you, Wikipedia or Melbourne Radio Operations Pty Ltd to use its name. Please remove immediately. Ash Long, Director, Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd.

As I have no links to any station what-so-ever, I do not understand why you are complaining at me. Anyway, I am just trying to maintain a neutral standpoint on the issue. Wally Otto (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 3MP, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 05:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to 3MP. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 06:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to 3MP. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please Explain

What do you mean by 'the reason are there', the first week guide has been released, it is an official guide provided by PBL Media which is enough proof of what programming will be broadcasted, as you will find with other articles about television channels, such as ABC3, List of programs broadcast by Network Ten etc.

Fine, agree there, but take into consideration it's a brand new channel. I will quote Talk:GEM HD, in particular Cyril Washbrook's comment.

It is not appropriate to list every single programme that Nine says will air on GEM. Firstly, only some of them have been confirmed as airing in the near future: posting a purportedly comprehensive list of programmes gives the false impression that the list is representative of what will be seen on GEM in the near future. We can't give that guarantee. Consider what happens if GEM fails to broadcast a programme on that list, for example: how long should it be left up there? Networks don't issue press releases declaring that they have decided against airing a series.

That, and WP:NOTTVGUIDE in my opinion is enough to remove it. Wally Otto (talk) 06:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't agree, however I'm willing to keep the list off until the programs in question have been broadcast. Thanks for responding, have a nice day Matt-tastic (talk) 07:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

7mate article

I fail to see how my amendments to the 7mate article in April constituted the inclusion of a television guide.

The amendments that I gave to the article delivered it (and hopefully readers from across the globe) the opportunity to see what is scheduled on the channel across a number of timeslots. The channel airs outside the periods of 6pm to midnight (the channel broadcasts 24/7) and is broken up into sections which I mentioned and I gave some examples so that readers would better understand what was written and better understand what 7mate is which is the point of the channel.

In addition, I gave the article some cleaning which also seems to have been deleted and I hope I will be able to clean the article up as I can see needs to be done for the benefit of the article, the site's integrity and readers. cpandilo 08:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]