User talk:Wallace.megan
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Wallace.megan and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 15:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Megan! My name is Emma and I can't wait to see what types of things you edit on Wikipedia.
Hello Megan! My name is Symone and I'm just exploring talk pages right now to see how this all goes! I hope you don't mind that I bolded this. I didn't want it to get lost in all the information! SymoneSine (talk) 04:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Job Satisfaction article evaluation
[edit]1. Everything in the article seemed to be relevant to job satisfaction. 2. There is not anything that stood out to me as being biased. 3. I think their could have been some more information on the history of job satisfaction and some more information about the different models and methods used to test it. 4. All of the citations that I checked worked. There were some links that were showing up red though. 5. It does not seem that everything is referenced like it should be. 6. Something that could be added to the article would be some more history and some more methods and models. 7. I looked at the talk page for the article. There was a lot of complaints and corrections that people were making. 8. The article was rated as a mild C-class.
Wallace.megan (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Megan WallaceCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).