User talk:Walesgal92

Beckermonds

It is noted that [Beckermonds] exists, but the article is seriously lacking in any notable information other then where it is. Because it is a place that I'm sure has more to it then "it is here" can be saved by adding some notable content. --Pmedema (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beckermonds

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Beckermonds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

You removed the prod without explination. Fix the notibility or I will bring it up for a proposed deletion.--Pmedema (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Beckermonds

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beckermonds, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beckermonds. Thank you. Pmedema (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]