Jump to content

User talk:Wakmpeod2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wakmpeod2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I newly joined Wikipedia and did not know well how to use it. So I started to practice creating a page. I was blocked within few hours after that. The page I created, was not an advertisement and I just wanted to let others know what I know. I picked the topic as I know well about and I did not thought that it was a violation of the policy. Also did not know how to practice on my sandbox or create an actual page. Could you guys help me out? Wkpediamo (talk) 01:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The Draft you created was blatant marketing copy for yet another new blockchain company. If you want to have any chance of being unblocked, you would need to disclose your connection with AMO Labs and agree not to write about it again. Also please read WP:COI and WP:PAID before you make a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wakmpeod2 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #22886 was submitted on Oct 08, 2018 01:30:26. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wkpediamo. Can you describe what pages you would edit if you were unblocked? Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So it's mere coincidence that your user name contains "amo"" and you were writing about AMO labs? And that the draft you wrote was ad copy?? If you've no other interests, I see no point in unblocking.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]