User talk:WakandianFightingWarrior21

Welcome

Hello WakandianFightingWarrior21 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Casey Biggs, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moon Mullins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Moon_Mullins.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UB

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WakandianFightingWarrior21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, those were test edits and once I saw the message on my talk page I realized they were actually going through and stopped. I made no further edits after the second warning but was blocked without making any more edits.WakandianFightingWarrior21 (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Typical test edits are writing "does this really work?" or "Test edit" or "hello". What you were doing was vandalism with misleading edit summaries. There is no way I am unblocking you. PhilKnight (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WakandianFightingWarrior21 (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]