User talk:Wahyoo-hoo-hoo

July 2012

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Can you tell me what policies so I can fix the article? Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't create silly articles and waste our time. Acroterion (talk) 00:06, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can I stop the articles from being silly according to your policy? Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (talk) 00:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep trolling you'll be blocked from editing for a while. Acroterion (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trolling. I just want to know which policies interfere with my page. I was gonna fix the page, if you were helpful and pointed me to the right policy.. But since you're clearly trying to not be helpful and are acting like you own Wikipedia, I can't do anything to contribute helpfully. How could an article about a number be vandalism? It didn't have a random string of numbers that even included G2. Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? How do you think "8037 is a number that was killed by Grace Mullinax, reports NBC News" is factual or a valid encyclopedia article? Again, stop trolling: you've forfeited my initial assumption of good faith.. Acroterion (talk) 00:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop insisting I'm trolling, and preventing me from contributing to Wikipedia. Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 00:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This mean, unhelpful user called Acroterion is not letting me contribute to Wikipedia or point me to the policies he claims I'm breaking, thus preventing me from ever improving and keeping me in this uninformed state. Wahyoo-hoo-hoo (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 00:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition to my unblock decline above, I'd like to add that unless you can provide a serious rationale for your editing to date I'm certain that you talk page priviledges will be revoked as well. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 01:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]