Jump to content

User talk:WackyWikiWoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, WackyWikiWoo, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 04:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

WackyWikiWoo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi WackyWikiWoo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate Custom Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Storm Area 51 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Storm Area 51

[edit]

The article Storm Area 51 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Storm Area 51 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Place (Reddit) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Place (Reddit)

[edit]

The article Place (Reddit) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Place (Reddit) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Storm Area 51

[edit]

On 29 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Storm Area 51, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Storm Area 51" was a comedic Facebook event intended as a raid on Area 51 in search of aliens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Storm Area 51. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Storm Area 51), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WackyWikiWoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn’t aware making accounts for quick edits here and there was not allowed. I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its “purpose”. I have not used any of these accounts to make disruptive edits. I understand the rule now and will not do this again. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Berean Hunter's comments below. The "but I didn't know the rules" defence is not plausible in this case. Yunshui 雲水 22:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

[edit]

@Deepfriedokra: The main account I have used is this one, the others were “throwaway” accounts I created, not knowing about the policy you’ve linked. I have read and understood it now.WackyWikiWoo (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose the complete list of other accounts you have used. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla: They’re on the investigation page, but I’ll reproduce them here:
WackyWikiWoo (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing you've said is truthful. Take a look at Category:Requests for unblock and see that your request has been seen by the project's admins for a week and no one is accepting of your story. Now, you can double down and try to insist that you have been truthful with us or you can revise your unblock request and be honest with us this time.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Berean Hunter: I’m not sure why what I’ve said is so surely untruthful. Given that none of the edits were disruptive, I don’t know what you believe the purpose of these accounts to be other than what I’ve said. I did not know of the rule, and have stated I understand the rule now and I won’t do it again. Even if you think I am lying, can’t I be unblocked on the basis that I understand the rule and won’t make the same mistake again? WackyWikiWoo (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, because we do not accept insincere unblock requests and because I don't believe you that you didn't know that it was policy. Your reply that you didn't know sounds like you are trying to game the system. You've only offered up the accounts that you've got caught with and none of your previous accounts. I don't think this was your first account either.
You used your main account to make this edit and then returned to that article with five other accounts to remove sections and remove tags (article history). This makes your statement, "I made them to avoid using my IP, because I like to use my main account for edits relating to internet culture, almost as its 'purpose'" into absolute nonsense. You used your main account on the article in the first place and there would be no logical reason to create accounts or use your IP for any kind of followup editing. Why would you make the statement that you were avoiding using your IP? Why would it cross your mind to do logged out editing at all? That shows deceptive thinking. Also, you weren't "making accounts for quick edits here and there" as it takes more work to create the accounts than it would to have simply used your main account for quick edits. You also created several accounts above to hold in reserve...you didn't use them for any editing at the time. Shows intent on your part...and frankly, there is something wrong with the notion that creating many accounts is normal behavior. It isn't and anyone trying to sell that idea shouldn't be trusted.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PlaceReddit.PNG

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PlaceReddit.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment notice

[edit]

Place (Reddit) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gradual Liquidation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WackyWikiWoo&oldid=1231133407"