User talk:WROBO

Welcome!

Hello, WROBO, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Andrew Mill (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Interval Locality

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Proper Interval Locality, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.electrodynamics-of-special-relativity.com/Compton-Effect. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under Construction Tag/Proper Interval Locality

I noticed your UNDER CONTRUCTION note at the top of the article Proper Interval Locality. I've inserted the tag {{underconstruction}} onto the page.
Please go ahead and remove the tag when your major edits are complete. -- Andrew Mill (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andrew

AfD nomination of Proper Interval Locality

An article that you have been involved in editing, Proper Interval Locality, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proper Interval Locality. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J kasd 00:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. The main concern with the "Proper Interval Locality" article was that it violated the policy against the publication of orginal research. The consensus here is that scientific theories need to have undergone proper peer review before publication on Wikipedia. If you can point to outside peer review or similar coverage in reliable sources, please let me know and we can discuss it further.--Kubigula (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to desk reference 3 December 2007

According to proper interval locality the propagation of electromagnetism is facilitated by the signature of the space-time metric. Since the metric signature is common to both flat and curved space-time then the theory is valid in space-time as defined by both special and general relativity. I would suggest a glance is inadequate if you wish to understand proper interval locality, however here are some of the salient points.

1. The wave particle duality of matter results from the geometry associated with our inertial reference frames and is an inevitable consequence of the constancy of the speed of light relative to those frames. 2. The theory distinguishes between observable events that can be assigned precise and accurate locality relative to our inertial reference grids and quantum events that do not have exact locality relative to our inertial grids. (Where quantum event is considered to be a point in the history of a quantum object relative to itself) 3. The metric associated with our inertial reference grids, precludes the possibility of quantum events being assigned a unique set of coordinates relative to our reference grids, instead quantum events are projected onto our reference as event surfaces. 4. The light cones illustrated in the website are quantum event surfaces. In free space the apex of the light cone is the proper interval locality of the quantum event. 5. Pairs of quantum objects are likely to interact if the apexes of their light cones are spatially close. (The likelihood of interaction falling off with the inverse of the square of the spatial separation) 6. Every point on the primary light cone is projected onto our reference grids as a secondary light cone. This mechanism results in an infinite succession of event surface projections that fill the whole of space-time. (It is this secondary quantum event surface projection that is responsible for the interference effects in experiments such a Young's double slit.) 7. In Aspect's experiment the quantum event surface associated with the cascade of the calcium atom intercepts the detectors at the moments the detections occur. The calcium atom relative to itself interacts with both detectors immediately and simultaneously, therefore, the result must be inherently correlated regardless of when the polarizer's are set. 8. Proper interval locality is a self-consistent theory which is also wholly consistent with both relativity and quantum mechanics (That is the mathematics of quantum mechanics, clearly it deviates metaphysically in that it does not accept that light is required to be mediated by a particle.)

Reply to desk reference 3 December 2007

According to proper interval locality the propagation of electromagnetism is facilitated by the signature of the space-time metric. Since the metric signature is common to both flat and curved space-time then the theory is valid in space-time as defined by both special and general relativity. I would suggest a glance is inadequate if you wish to understand proper interval locality, however here are some of the salient points.

1. The wave particle duality of matter results from the geometry associated with our inertial reference frames and is an inevitable consequence of the constancy of the speed of light relative to those frames.

2. The theory distinguishes between observable events that can be assigned precise and accurate locality relative to our inertial reference grids and quantum events that do not have exact locality relative to our inertial grids. (Where quantum event is considered to be a point in the history of a quantum object relative to itself).

3. The metric associated with our inertial reference grids, precludes the possibility of quantum events being assigned a unique set of coordinates relative to our reference grids, instead quantum events are projected onto our reference as event surfaces.

4. The light cones illustrated in the website are quantum event surfaces. In free space the apex of the light cone is the proper interval locality of the quantum event.

5. Pairs of quantum objects are likely to interact if the apexes of their light cones are spatially close. (The likelihood of interaction falling off with the inverse of the square of the spatial separation)

6. Every point on the primary light cone is projected onto our reference grids as a secondary light cone. This mechanism results in an infinite succession of event surface projections that fill the whole of space-time. (It is this secondary quantum event surface projection that is responsible for the interference effects in experiments such a Young's double slit.)

7. In Aspect's experiment the quantum event surface associated with the cascade of the calcium atom intercepts the detectors at the moments the detections occur. The calcium atom relative to itself interacts with both detectors immediately and simultaneously, therefore, the result must be inherently correlated regardless of when the polarizers are set.

8. Proper interval locality is a self-consistent theory which is also wholly consistent with both relativity and quantum mechanics (That is the mathematics of quantum mechanics, clearly it deviates metaphysically in that it does not accept that light is required to be mediated by a particle.)