User talk:WRC3

Your submission at Articles for creation: HighVolMusic (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HighVolMusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WRC3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, WRC3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:HighVolMusic has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:HighVolMusic. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 08:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing errors

You keep adding malformatted references to your draft, hence the error messages in red. I corrected the syntax of the first batch for you, but please read WP:Referencing for beginners and sort the others out, & please expand them beyond bare urls. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I think I may have messed that up. I have removed all the urls and references just now. I saw the

added. I am reading the help section to try and figure it out. Thanks you for the assistance, I appreciate it. You are the only one that has given me any help other than sending me more links to review which confuse me even more.

Your submission at Articles for creation: HighVolMusic (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HighVolMusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HighVolMusic (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Concerns listed previously by reviewers have not adequately been addressed. References aren't about the company but about artists mentioning the company in passing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HighVolMusic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 13:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HighVolMusic

Hello, WRC3. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "HighVolMusic".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JHamo. Thank you for contacting me. I am sorry to say that we are no longer pursuing getting anything published in Wikipedia. It's too hard and too confusing and no one seems to be able to helps us get our company page published. We get pointed to KB and noticeboards which in the end have not helped us. Everything listed in our page is FACT, not made up, not hyperbole, not amplified, just FACTS. I see competitors and musical artists that have much less information not to mention baseless and they are published. So with that, if the submission isn't deleted please do so. We have a backup copy. Thank you. --WRC3 (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]