User talk:WPweb3

Welcome!

Hello, WPweb3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Bitget, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! •Cyberwolf• 13:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bitget

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bitget, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. •Cyberwolf• 13:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello •Cyberwolf• I created a new based based on WP standards ensuring reputable citations, neutral language etc. Can you please share your advice on reinstating this page before I continue to create new pages in Tech? WPweb3 (talk) 09:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Hi! You emailed me, though there was nothing in your message that you couldn't have posted here. Slightly against my better judgement, I'll send you the content of Draft:Bitget – but you'll have to enable your email for me to do so (at Special:Preferences). Leave a note here when you've done that, I should see it.

I strongly advise against re-posting that content or anything remotely like it – this project does not tolerate WP:promotion of any kind (and our perception of what constitutes promotion may have changed somewhat since 2004!). Please also ensure that you make full disclosure of any conflict of interest or paid connection you have in relation to this company; your user page is the best place for that. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Justlettersandnumbers, I have reviewed the article again against all the guidelines and will revisit the tone as all reputation citations and references were included. I also have no conflict of interest, just trying to update all the dated tech content here. WPweb3 (talk) 10:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Justlettersandnumbers based on the above page improvements to meet WP standards, can you please advise if you are happy for page to be reinstated? Thanks WPweb3 (talk) 09:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm JaggedHamster. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JaggedHamster (talk) 09:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @JaggedHamster, which article are you referring to? WPweb3 (talk) 10:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was your change to Fintech I was referring to but looking at your recent changes there are other examples such as your changes to Educational technology and Abu Dhabi Investment Office. I'd suggest reading WP:RS. Press releases, company blogs etc aren't great sources in general.

Also, you've been marking your contributions as minor, you should read WP:MINOR, it has a specific meaning and doesn't apply to any of your changes. JaggedHamster (talk) 12:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened the recent changes and corrected them. Thanks. WPweb3 (talk) 12:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bitget

Hello, WPweb3,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ganesha811 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Bitget, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ganesha811}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 03:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WPweb3,

I've removed the speedy deletion tag from this article as it is different than the version that was deleted through AFD. This article still might be tagged for deletion for a different reason but it doesn't warrant an CSD G4 deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Liz I will continue to expand on the article and other industry related pages. WPweb3 (talk) 04:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bitget for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitget is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitget (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 04:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ganesha811 I wrote a new article based on my research but I will review your comments and discuss on the page. Thanks. WPweb3 (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]