User talk:WOLFE0007

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Zhang He. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They arent un constructive they're just what he was doing tonight

An uninvited change to another editor's userpage is unconstructive. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh ur mean the part on his button thing not his talk page ok i understand that

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Zhang He. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Manway (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

explain to me how this is being a vanal he warned my ip 3 times because i changed his edit where he changed nate diaz to nick diaz on ufc 11 repeatedly so explain that

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:Zhang He. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Manway (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Reports

See WP:AIV. --Manway (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wow and now i bet u feel like a big man on wikipedia cause blocked me and wont respond maybe u should grow a pair and realise wikipedia is usless in real life espaecially because any paper using it as a source will just be failed so get off ur high hourse and be a man all i did was try and stop unwarrented censorship and get someone admit they were wrong for warning my ip WOLFE0007 (talk) 05:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WOLFE0007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did not vandalise any articles and was attempting to get a vandal to anwser me for his reason as he did other but was repeatedly censored and also did not want others reading that the afformentioned vandal was contributing to the upkeep UFC 111 as i was and recieved warnings from him for legitimate corrections to his mistaken or malicious misnaming of Nate Diaz during the course of my maintainence of the vandlism to GSP vs Hardy and Carwin Mir areas of the Main Fight Card.

Decline reason:

I'm unwilling to consider this due to the personal attacks just above this request. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 01:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for two weeks, to be specific. Two personal attacks, followed by vandalising articles immediately after returning from a block is hardly the behaviour of a constructive editor. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 01:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

well the first block was due to censorship and also am i supposed to care that some fag on the internet finds me an unconstructive editor. anyways last time i was editing things properly i got warned twice by a guy for not letting him change a fighters name so honestly grow up wikipedia is useless anyways if it was a legitimate publication it would not be black ball as a source from grade 4 on. WOLFE0007 (talk) 01:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]