User talk:WKFS

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

--joe decker ^talk 19:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WKFS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't believe I've been treated like a felon for simply adding an article (several times) about a really well known personality like Saverio Fabbri! There so many references and supporting links, and I don't understand why there are so many obsolete articles that don't get deleted; example: Saverio Fabbri was, beyond other things, an international cricketer, so why hasn't, for example, Luis Di Giglio's article (exclusively a cricketer and nothing else) and endless others got deleted yet? I mean, do you think this is a fair way to publish articles? A person who is notable in many different fields gets deleted and a person notable exclusively in one field doesn't? Why??? I'm so totally sure you won't be able to answer my questions in a way that satisfies me. I think all articles and people should be just treated the same way.WKFS (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not why this account is blocked, the block is for abusive use of multiple accounts. Please request unblock on your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.