User talk:Vyom420

Vyom420, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vyom420! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zee TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay dear! No Problem 😇😇 Vyom420 (talk) 08:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 5a5ha seven. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 5a5ha seven (talk | contribs)^{[citation needed]} 16:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem🙂🙂🙂 Vyom420 (talk) 17:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Zee TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. An edit that you recently made to Badi Dooooor Se Aaye Hai seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Sony SAB, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Hum TV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Don't add links to draft articles in main articles, especially when they are totally unsourced. They are in draft for a reason, as you well know. Ravensfire (talk) 13:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Sony Entertainment Television. Repeatedly adding unsourced material despite multiple notes and warnings, at this point it is deliberate contempt for Wikipedia and vandalism. Ravensfire (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sasural Simar Ka 2

Hello Vyom420,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Govvy, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Sasural Simar Ka 2, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Draft:Sasural Simar Ka 2. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Govvy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Badi Door Se Aaya Koi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Badi Door Se Aaya Koi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum (March 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has already been returned from article space to draft space once as having no sources and already declined once as having no sources. Because this draft has no sources, it cannot satisfy television notability. Do not resubmit this draft.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

If this television series is notable or becomes notable, an article can be developed by another editor.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balika Vadhu 2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Balika Vadhu 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😀😀😀😀😁😁😁😁 Vyom420 (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vyom420, no references? Really? Come on, you know better than to create articles like that. Use draft space or use your sandbox. And without references, that draft is an immediate decline. Stop adding information to articles without a reference. Ravensfire (talk) 15:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

I have deleted a comment from this talk page, which was a personal attack against Ravensfire. Personal attacks are not tolerated at Wikipedia.

Additionally, any content you add must be supported by reliable published sources, so for instance these are unsuitable[1][2] as was your attempt to create an article on Balika Vadhu 2 in live space. If you're not willing to add references when you make changes like this, you will very quickly find yourself unwelcome to edit here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balika Vadhu 2 (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hulged was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Balika Vadhu 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Balika Vadhu 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Hulged ⟨talk⟩ 16:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Vyom420! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 17:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This may help you some understand why so many of your edits are reverted. Please go through the tutorial, it will only help. Ravensfire (talk) 17:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Vyom420, please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources. Edits without sources will be removed, drafts without sources will be rejected. You've been told this before and the past couple of drafts have been rejected for this reason. Hopefully you're starting to figure this out. That page will help you understand how to correctly cite sources and the reliable source page will help you understand what is a good source. Please read those. Ravensfire (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again [3] no reliable sources were provided while adding this material here. Sid95Q (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vyom420 - at this point, I'm just going to be reverting unsourced edits of your as vandalism. By now, you know that you're supposed to include sources when adding information. That you aren't means you are willfully ignoring this and willfully trying to harm Wikipedia. Do you understand this at all? Have you bothered to read ANY of these attempts to help you and finally start warning you? Ravensfire (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?!?

Vyom420, Would you please explain this series of edits the Fast & Furious article? Besides not having any sources as usual, you're flat out just making up film names. I mean "Returns Of The Furious Brother"? Give me a break, that's not even decent English. I even took a chance on the first couple that you may actually have something and did some searching and found absolutely nothing. Cyphoidbomb, this is rapidly turning into a time-waste. Ravensfire (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:BDSAH221 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BDSAH221. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 04:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Badi Door Se Aaya Koi

Hello, Vyom420. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Badi Door Se Aaya Koi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum

Hello, Vyom420. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Badi Door Se Aaya Koi

Hello, Vyom420. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Badi Door Se Aaya Koi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]