User talk:Vwvu

Welcome!

Hello, Vwvu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jain University has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome. Abecedare (talk) 07:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Jain International Residential School has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 08:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for multiple unsourced, unexplained and unconstructive edits with deliberately misleading edit summaries on Jain International Residential School and Jain University. Thomas.W ^talk 08:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Jain International Residential School

Hello. Please stop both repeatedly adding unsourced material and equally repeatedly removing content without a valid reason. The links you removed with an edit summary saying "Spam Content removed" are not spam, they're perfectly valid internal links to Wikipedia articles about similar schools in the same location.

Seeing your contributions, which are all on Jain International Residential School except for a single similar edit on Jain University, I get the impression that you might have a conection to the Jain International Residential School. If that is the case I want you to read the Wikipedia guidelines for editing with a conflict of interest, but even if it isn't the case you must stop your disruptive editing, or you risk getting blocked from editing. Thomas.W ^talk 10:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vwvu, can you please clarify if you have any association with The JGI Group that would cause you to have a conflict of interest (COI) while editing Jain University, Jain International Residential School etc? I ask because so far your edits do seem promotional (besides not being consistent with wikipedia's manual of style), and if you have any COI it would be best to restrict your edits to the articles' talk pages. Abecedare (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Final warning for repeated unsourced edits, with deliberately misleading edit summaries, in spite of multiple warnings. Thomas.W ^talk 14:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jain International Residential School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "Schoolfinder" is not a reliable source and can not be used as a reference. Thomas.W ^talk 07:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jain International Residential School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jain International Residential School was changed by Vwvu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962458 on 2015-08-13T18:59:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jain International Residential School, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 19:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwvu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

will use one account only Vwvu (talk) 06:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Glad to hear that. You can use that one account in a week. HighInBC 06:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jain International Residential School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 19:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not Facebook or an extension of the school's own website, and adding long lists of various sports, long detailed descriptions of what equipment there is in the classrooms, etc, is very unencyclopaedic, and does not belong here! Thomas.W ^talk 20:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 05:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Thomas.W ^talk 21:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Final warning (again) for repeated disruptive edits adding unencyclopaedic and/or promotional material to the article. Thomas.W ^talk 12:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been making unhelpful edits to this one article for so long that I think next time I will take the two final warnings here seriously. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Drchriswilliams (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jain International Residential School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W ^talk 13:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes at Jain International Residential School

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See this report at WP:AIV. EdJohnston (talk) 13:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston, thank you for taking action; you have poured the editor a nice cup full of the milk of human kindness. Vwvu, I know you don't like looking at your talk page, but I'll say this anyway: the next promotional edit (whether under this account or not) will earn you an indefinite block. It's not just that your edits are blatantly promotional, it's also that they are just so bad, such poor quality, such lousy punctuation. In addition, your complete lack of communication is a disruption in its own right. In other words, there was plenty of reason already for EdJohnston to block you indefinitely; please don't waste this opportunity. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jain International Residential School. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for for continuing to insert unsourced material in Jain International Residential School, ignoring all warnings and shorter blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 10:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vwvu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]