User talk:Vulgarurbanism

Greetings!

Hello, you vulgarly urbane person!

I noticed that neccesity just as I was logging out in a hurry to catch the bus. I wondered how long it would stay there! What I require most in life is a spell checker to follow me around. (Well, that's one of the things that my life requires, anyway...) all the best --Amandajm 10:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

alert

Spatial information architecture laboratory

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Spatial information architecture laboratory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

(we almost never have articles for any but major free-standing university institutes--and generally not even to individual departments--I suggest you let let this be redirected to the university)

DGG (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Fair enough, I simply put that entry in because it is relevant to Mark Burry. Perhaps mention of SIAL should come under the page for RMIT's School of Architecture, which is where it does in fact 'reside'. Which I notice does not exist at the moment, but there are similar pages for the University of Melbourne, for example Faculty of Engineering, University of Melbourne... Vulgarurbanism 02:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sir Robin Edward Dysart Grey, from its old location at User:Vulgarurbanism/Sir Robin Edward Dysart Grey, 6th Baronet. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Edward Dysart Grey has been accepted

Robin Edward Dysart Grey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude talk 05:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Fallodon. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Diannaa, I’d paraphrased most of the content (it was rather long and a bit archaic) but see I used the citation incorrectly, thanks for clarifying it. Vulgarurbanism (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]