User talk:Vtomole
Welcome
[edit]
|
The article Cirq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability. All sources are from the Cirq project itself, none are third-party sources unaffiliated with the project.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 19:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I see you reverted this with the comment that the Gizmodo article is a "trustworthy third-party source". But that source is identified as a press-release, which is not a third-party source, even if published by a third party; see WP:PRSOURCE. Are you characterizing it wrong in the article, or in your edit summary? TJRC (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
I didn't know that a press release is not considered a third party source. I've changed it.
Ways to improve Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm
[edit]Hello, Vtomole,
Thanks for creating Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Refs no. 2 and 3 are unpublished class lecture notes and they don't qualify as WP:RS
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nsk92 (talk) 01:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey, @Nsk92:
I have added a verified source to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein-Vazirani_algorithm page and removed the "unreliable sources" tag. Let me know if there is anything else I need to do.
Thank you.
Ways to improve Magic state distillation
[edit]Hello, Vtomole,
Thank you for creating Magic state distillation.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
While Wikipedia articles should be sufficiently technical, they must also be understandable by the average person. Please endeavor to better explain the concept of the article, and provide additional context. Most folks don't have a background in quantum physics, let alone quantum computing.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CaptainEek}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Quantum singular value transformation
[edit]Hello, Vtomole,
Thank you for creating Quantum singular value transformation.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please do not remove tags. You cannot claim to be an expert for your own articles, COI.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ldm1954 (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Ldm1954:,the page you have tagged as not meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines is a summary of a paper that was published in one of the most prestigious computer science journals in the world. Please search for "Quantum singular value transformation" on this page: http://acm-stoc.org/stoc2019/STOC%202019%20accepted%20papers.html to confirm. What else do we need to do to make this page notable? Vtomole (talk) 04:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Ways to improve Quantum singular value transformation
[edit]Hello, Vtomole,
Thank you for creating Quantum singular value transformation.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please do not adhoc remove notability or other labels.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ldm1954 (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Neutral atom quantum computer for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutral atom quantum computer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.