User talk:Vsmith95

November 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Edinburgh Solicitors Property Centre— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Edinburgh Solicitors Property Centre, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Edinburgh Solicitors Property Centre. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. LcawteHuggle (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vsmith95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19705 was submitted on Nov 07, 2017 14:04:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vsmith95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Genuine account to edit our own Company Wiki page

Decline reason:

Company accounts are not allowed, and companies should not be editing their own Wikipedia articles. And you should absolutely not be adding marketing material like "ESPC is the most efficient and effective way to market property for sale in Edinburgh, the Lothians and Fife. With over 140 member solicitor estate agents, we advertise thousands of local properties...". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vsmith95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19727 was submitted on Nov 09, 2017 12:15:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]