User talk:Vrs26

Welcome!

Hello, Vrs26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Rosemary Amey 20:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Underground stock info boxes

Please do not come along and change the info boxes that are being added to the London Underground rolling stock pages. The boxes you are replacing are being added under a wiki project and were added after discussion. If you feel the need to add please discuss it first. Jsp3970 13:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel like improving the info boxes that's fine, as I said the idea to add the info in the first place was discussed before being implented. I will be the first to admit that it is not perfect and does need to be improved, which is why you see so many different versions right now. I did revert three, as these are the ones I am working on to improve, testing to see which would be the best. It is the aim to have a standard infobox across all stock, past, present, and future. Unfortunately with your design this would not work as photos of the stock from the past can't be added, due to copyright issues. This was considered before adding the infoboxes hence the lack of photos in them. As I mentioned there is a wiki project on London Transport, feel free to check it out, Wikipedia:WikiProject_London_Transport Jsp3970 13:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These discussions took place on the user page of myself and Unisouth. He asked for me to standerdize the rolling stock pages as that is my only interest in London Underground. If you look on my talk page it is signed Lenny (used to be Unisouths ID until a few months ago). I know it isn't much of a conversation but at the time I was the only one interested in working on this part of the project. I must admit that the layout of yours looks better than mine, I was trying to use colour codes to indicate if it was a tube stock (blue) and surface stock (red). However indicating which line they are assigned to would not work for older stock, and for some of the new stock it doesn't indicate what lines they may have worked on in the past. Jsp3970 15:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For some of the stock, it can get confusing trying to include the information for when they worked on specific lines, I think it would be best if that was left to be included in the main article. This is what I had to do with the numbers, moving them from the info box into the main article as some fleets were quite extensive and not all numbers could be listed. I do like the part where it states the years that the stock was in service. Also there should be something to attract the eye to the infobox, maybe a different colour for the background of the heading. Also at the bottom you have listed the different car types. Over the many years there have been many different types of car designations, not all of which would fit into the bottom of the box. Jsp3970 20:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added seating to the template. Have added the infobox to London Underground G Stock. You may see why I suggest a different colour for the header as without a photo it tends to blend together. As for infoboxex being muted, no way. I have seen some very colourful infoboxes. Check out the following for an example EN57, and British Rail Class 17. You may see where I got the inspiration for my infoboxs from. Jsp3970 21:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow it would seem wrong to use metric units for the old stock. All the sources I have for them gives the units in imperial. But it could very well be given in both units, for modern units - metric (imperial) - for older units - imperial (metric). But at what point to you decide what is old or modern. May I suggest 1967 stock for the tube and A60/62 stock for the surface stock. Jsp3970 04:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:S-exterior.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:S-exterior.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:S-exterior.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:S-exterior.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tube-stock.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tube-stock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Olympic-venues-east.png

Thanks for uploading File:Olympic-venues-east.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Olympic-venues-east.png

Thanks for uploading File:Olympic-venues-east.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Underground stock

Hi Vrs26
Please see Template talk:Infobox Underground stock#Additional parameters. Peter Horn User talk 22:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional parameters

Vrs26,
Please see Template talk:Infobox Underground stock#Additional parameters. Peter Horn User talk 19:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Underground stock

Template:Infobox Underground stock has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox train. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sub-surface.jpg

The file File:Sub-surface.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]