Jump to content

User talk:Vrrajkum/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2


Welcome!

Hello, Vrrajkum! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Irn (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

October 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Capitalismojo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Socialism because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:V and WP:OR your efforts to insert opinion and unref'd material is disruptive Capitalismojo (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

User TFD has requested editors vote on the socialism talk page on what the scope of the article should be. I suggest you take a look: [1] -Battlecry 08:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I award you The Worker's Barn Star!

The Workers' Barnstar
This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism.

Thank's for your work on the socialism page. You are appreciated. Magnus bjerg (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Accidental deletion of over 16,000 characters of text.

Vrrajkum: On 29-NOV-2015 you made this edit but it appears you accidentally deleted over 16,000 characters of text from the article without explanation. I have corrected the problem but please be more careful when editing articles and always leave a clear and detailed description of your edit (beyond the default provided by Visual Editor) in the Edit Summary. Thank you. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 06:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Please use the Edit Summary field

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

Moving or copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Socialism into Socialism (economic system). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Images. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syro-Palestinian archaeology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syro-Palestinian archaeology. Legobot (talk) 00:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources

You added a reference to the lead of Confirmation bias, a Featured Article. Unfortunately, that book is by VDM Publishing who are notorious for copying their books from.... Wikipedia. That was a circular reference. See WP:ALPHASCRIPT and WP:PUS. Check Google Book hits carefully before using them as a source. Fences&Windows 00:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Fences and windows: I was not aware of VDM's reputation, but wanted to add that I was the one who originally added the sentence "It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning." from VDM in 2014 (I did not have a Wikipedia account back then). VDM did not copy that sentence, at least, from Wikipedia, if that's what you are suggesting. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
VDM is also the source that I used to rephrase the lead sentence from "favor information" to "search for or interpret information", also in 2014. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Of course you weren't aware or you'd not have used the source. This is how they make money out of buyers, especially libraries - they dupe people. Yes, VDM did copy it from Wikipedia and you using VDM as a source merely reinserted old wording originally found in Wikipedia itself. See this old version of the article from October 2009, for example. Please don't use VDM/Alphascript/Betascript books as a source. Fences&Windows 22:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@Fences and windows: I see. My mistake, thanks for letting me know. Vrrajkum (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church. Legobot (talk) 00:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oldest people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oldest people. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of oldest living people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of oldest living people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stevie Boi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stevie Boi. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song). Legobot (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • year=1998|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=978-0-262-52255-7|page=106|author=Robert F. Barsky}}</ref> [[John Dewey], [[Nelson Goodman]], [[Zellig Harris]], [[Hebrew literature]],<ref>{{cite web|author=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox scientist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Noam Chomsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Uppsala University]<ref name="LENT" />

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vrrajkum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Late ping

Notifications from discussions (pings) do not work unless added in the same edit as a valid signature. Thus this edit did not produce a notification. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

DS alert: Donald Trump

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

You commented in the discussion about whether to use ISIS or ISIL. Four hours later, having received no reply there, you modified the article per your viewpoint on the matter. That is not how it works, especially at an article under the ArbCom remedies. I would suggest that you self-revert and continue to participate in the discussion. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I have (I think) reverted all of this edit. Again, please do not make edits to content under discussion. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Out (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Get Out (film)

The article Get Out (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Get Out (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rusted AutoParts -- Rusted AutoParts (talk) 19:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Prologue to Covenant

Your edit for this from this morning was reverted on Alien: Covenant. Start Talk on the Talk page there if needed prior to edits. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 19:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@ManKnowsInfinity: Why do you feel that the Michelangelo statue should be mentioned? It's true, but to me it seems like an excessive degree of detail for a plot summary. Vrrajkum (talk) 21:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The reviews in the Critical reviews section of the article by Edelstein and Wilkinson are both in agreement as to the depiction of David as a Frankenstein monster in the film, Wilkinson even compares him to "Satan" in her review. The only hint the film gives of this level of malevolent behavior in David early in the film is his choice of King David, the King of Israel, as a role model for himself. That seems notable as an indication of the extremity of David's malevolence which appears later in the film and as summarized by Edelstein and Wilkinson. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vrrajkum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vrrajkum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Reversion thanking

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you.

AzCoy7 (talk) 03:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrrajkum/Archive_1&oldid=1142700799"