User talk:Vromano

I am considering removing the material you added to Little Italy, Chicago because it is unsourced. Can you properly source the information with references like the rest of the article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, what particular information to what I included in Chicago's Little Italy requires the sourcing you refer to. As a neophite writer, I appreciate any assistance you can provide. Please cc me, if you can, at vromano2005@yahoo.com and vromano@taylor streetarchives.com.

Vince Romano 312-443-6240

Hull House

I just noticed your personal contact info. I would prefer to keep this communication on the record if possible. Just take a little time to learn about the proper citation techniques used in the rest of the article. Then attempt to use the same techniques. This is for the good of the reader and the project as a whole. If you don't attempt to cite your contributions more properly, I am likely to chop them again when I review my watchlists tomorrow night. Please find enough about the newspaper articles that we can help the reader. The author, headline, page number, are all things that would help the reader to confirm the WP:RS. Cite each fact or group of facts instead of using a blanket ref.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Addams & Hull House

Information should appear on one page or the other, the same text should not be on both pages. It definitely should not be cut and pasted from one to the other without regard for formatting. Better than having it in both places would be a link from one article to the other. Shsilver (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little Italy

I do understand you are making good faith edits. However, I would be able to help you clean up the pages if you could include sufficient information for me to make a full citation. Even though you may not know how to format a citation, you should be able to include the title of article and maybe a link. "August 28, 2008 Derrick Blakely, CBS TV" does not help the reader verify claim so well. Was this a show or a citation that you saw elsewhere? If it was a show name it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 08:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Addam & Hull House

See my response to you from November of last year, above. Shsilver (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again Hull House

The link to Greek Town which you keep reverting is a settlement in Nebraska. And headers should have the first word and proper names capitalized, but others lowercase-->Hull House neighborhood. Shsilver (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

friendly reminder...

Please don't forget always to provide edit summaries. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to American Dream appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. You added "Those who control our media not only control history but also control our destiny", but this was not cited, so I assumed it is your opinion being added to the article in violation of Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines. You added an essay about Italian Americans, but the essay is not notable. Binksternet (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]