User talk:Vraivermonter

This is Vraivermonter's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: User:Vraivermonter/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Vraivermonter/sandbox. Thanks! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 16:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, The Prefab Messiahs, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vraivermonter/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vraivermonter/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vraivermonter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Prefab Messiahs (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Prefab Messiahs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Prefab Messiahs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Vraivermonter/sandbox

Hello, Vraivermonter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Vraivermonter/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Vraivermonter/sandbox

Hello, Vraivermonter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Prefab Messiahs

Hello, Vraivermonter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Prefab Messiahs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Prefab Messiahs

Hello, Vraivermonter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Prefab Messiahs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time to revive the PreFab page?

I'm a friend of Xeth Feinberg of the PreFabs and was thinking they should have a Wikipedia article. A little (okay, quite a bit) research brought me here with questions. First, thanks for trying to create an article! What's your connection to the band? Did you give up on trying to create the article, or were you just unable to meet Wikipedia's requirements for acceptance? If it's the former, would you consider resuming your efforts? RatJan (talk) 01:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! Xeth has provided some add'l info to clarify things a bit. RatJan (talk) 16:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RatJan, Thanks for getting in touch. I thought I had put together a pretty nice entry for the Prefabs, but I was told they weren't "musically notable" enough, based on the text/links provided. I was able to find more, and more recent, sources to link to, and I added those, but the Wikipedia reviewers still didn't think the entry satisfied the criteria. I've been too busy to make a third attempt over the last several months, but I might try again soon. Vraivermonter (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xeth told me Kris recruited you to create the article, which cleared up a lot of questions. Yeah, the "not notable enough" rejection was interesting. Lots of reviews, interviews, etc. are out there, but they're college radio and underground media sources, so not considered "major". Fortunately, the article got copied to Everybodywiki when Wikipedia flagged it for deletion, so all of your work hasn't been lost. RatJan (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately I also saved a backup copy to my computer--I wasn't going to throw away all that work! I hope the next edition will be acceptable! Vraivermonter (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]