User talk:Voyager78906

Welcome!

Hello, Voyager78906, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some links that can help you get started editing:

And for more detailed information:

Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.

All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing! --Malthusian (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joke edits

Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and NPOV. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out! --Malthusian (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article British Rail Class 185 may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Thryduulf 12:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Im sure Russell Brand would love someone as hilarious as you writing on his article, but if you keep vandalising pages, you will be banned. Which will also be very funny. --Tefalstar (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to George W. Bush has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 18:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Noel Fielding constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 18:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to North Yorkshire Moors Railway. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tesco, you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhull andemu 13:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Luke Ward-Wilkinson

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Luke Ward-Wilkinson, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Luke Ward-Wilkinson is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Luke Ward-Wilkinson, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wikipedia was changed by Voyager78906 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962284 on 2010-12-31T13:41:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]