User talk:Voteliberalist

Notability of Social Liberalist Party

A tag has been placed on Social Liberalist Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

You should also be aware that wikipedia is strongly against people editing articles about themselves or organisations they are involved with. Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest is worth reading. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 22:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely by there being a political party in the UK, that warrants a page on it, which is why I included proof of its official presence. The article was also completely neutral, as you can see for yourself. Just because it is new, does not mean that people should be unaware of its existence!!! Voteliberalist (talk) 14:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This conversation continues over at my talk page. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 19:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]