User talk:Vorticity
Vorticity, I think it would be okay if you copied the article from the temp page, since the history will attribute it to you that way, and you're the only writer. Let me know when you have moved it and I can request that the temp page be deleted. Thanks, Kjkolb 10:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Question
[edit]I hope you don't mind if I ask you this, but are you Stephen Euin Cobb?--Pharos 09:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jim Baen's Universe
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Jim Baen's Universe, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Baen's Universe. Thank you. Fairsing 18:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Davey Beauchamp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Boc Cryotank
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Boc Cryotank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
As a contributor to this article back in 2006, you may be interested to know I have proposed it for deletion. Please see the article for more details. Robofish (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of ConCarolinas for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ConCarolinas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConCarolinas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. «l| Promethean ™|l» (talk) 11:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Davey Beauchamp for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davey Beauchamp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davey Beauchamp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)