User talk:Von Hugel Strudel

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently edited the PCIP article. The text you added seems to refer to a different treaty/law, Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, and is not fully NPOV (e.g. "subterfuge"). Further, it removed (without explanation) the fact that it is supported by the National Sheriffs' Association, even though it is clearly shown on Open Congress. We're glad to have you participating in Wikipedia, but please familiarize yourselves with our policies. You may find Five Pillars a good place to start. Thanks. Superm401 - Talk 01:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Your recent editing history at Baklava shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. E4024 (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

similar --Esc2003 (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 21:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Von Hugel Strudel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block was punitive and retaliatory by Turkish propagandist Esc2003. Tried to accommodate user by referencing all ethnic groups who claim Baklava as a signature pastry rather than just Turkic people. He repeatedly removed all references to Armenians and Greeks. He should be blocked. Von Hugel Strudel (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Replaceable fair use File:United States Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski.png

Thanks for uploading File:United States Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]