User talk:VolodyslavD

April 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you leave this message for me? I'm just trying to improve the information on the wiki. I'm not trying to war with anyone, but User:Panian513 is preventing me from editing by constantly reverting my changes, which is evident from the article's history. After each such reverting, I have tried to contact him there, but he ignores me, and if he continues to revert my changes, I will contact the administrators, with relevant evidence. VolodyslavD (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m an administrator, and you will be blocked if you keep edit warring. Acroterion (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And what does that mean? I said that I'm not the one reverting other people's changes, and that I'm not going to war, instead if Panian513 continues to revert my changes, I'll contact the admins. VolodyslavD (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be removing reliably sourced material without adequately explaining why it is incorrect, using sources. Please use the article talkpage to gain consensus first. Acroterion (talk) 15:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to explain my position twice, but was ignored. VolodyslavD (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the conflict is over: [1]. VolodyslavD (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you contacted an individual editor after removing reliably sourced material from the article without adequate explanation.The burden is on you to get consensus. Your changes have been disputed, and you are edit-warring to remove material. Stop now and get consensus on the article talkpage, not on an individual editor's talkpage. I strongly advise you to self-revert, or else you may be blcoked from that page until a consensus is gained. Acroterion (talk) 15:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to explain my point but didn't get a response, if the problem is that it should have been on the appropriate talk page, then sorry, I'll take that into account next time. But I did not avoid discussions. And can this be considered the end of the conflict, or do I still have to prove my point? VolodyslavD (talk) 15:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the third time: explain your proposed changes at Talk:Bans on Nazi symbols. It will be better if you self-revert the article changes until you get consensus. Consensus is compulsory. Acroterion (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll be making all my arguments on the talk page soon. But I still don't understand since when do you have to find a consensus on the wiki for each of your edits, but if you are talking about consensus with Panian513, how can I do it if he doesn't want to talk to me. VolodyslavD (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the fourth time, that's what the article talkpage is for. And see WP:BURDEN and WP:BRD. Being convinced that you're right and someone else is wrong isn't enough. Acroterion (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already answered that I realized that I should have argued my position on the talk page of the article, not the user, and now I am doing it. If sources are the problem, I heard it, and wanted to hear it, from Panian513. And I never said I was right and someone was wrong, the problem was that I wasn't heard, so I'm fixing that now by describing my position on the talk page. VolodyslavD (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]