User talk:Volga2

This user may have left Wikipedia. Volga2 has not edited Wikipedia since 16 February 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello Volga2! Are you a User:Volga at vi.wikipedia --minhhuy*= (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Volga2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Volga2, good luck, and have fun. --minhhuy*= (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of France

Guns' is in the bibliography. I have not yet added Buckley. Dapi89 (talk) 10:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mean:

Gunsburg, Jeffrey A., 'The Battle of the Belgian Plain, 12–14 May 1940: The First Great Tank Battle', The Journal of Military History, Vol. 56, No. 2. (Apr., 1992), pp. 207–244
Gunsburg, Jeffery A. 'The Battle of Gembloux, 14–15 May 1940: The "Blitzkrieg" Checked'. The Journal of Military History, Vol. 64, No. 1 (Jan., 2000), pp. 97–140

I have since corrected the date. Dapi89 (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling was wrong. Its been corrected. Dapi89 (talk) 11:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dapi89 (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

French air force

Hi again. I meant no offence by taking it out! Yes thats okay. My complaint over the French being spread thin in the air was just that it was taken slightly out of context. French air doctrine did emphasis concentration at decisive points. In fact, at points their concentration of aircraft was high - where they expected action to take place - so the ADLA was not 'spread thin' along the front so much, they were just not concentrated where they should have been - as indicated by Intel' and all the rest of it. I think your point is more valid though. The use of air power when the Germans were vulnerable in the Ardennes was forsaken. I do believe this is a critical point. If you want to go a head, I'll try and dig something up to support it. It won't be difficult, I think Karl-Heinz Frieser goes on about this missed opportunity either in the Blitzkrieg Legend or an article of his. I'll have to look. Dapi89 (talk) 11:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkirk

Done. Thanks for spotting it. Dapi89 (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Change to the American Revolutionary War

I like to information you introduced i feel though it needs to be cited. I f you could do that, that would be great other wise i will have to remove your revison for being uncited please look into that as soon as you can i plan to make no changes on that until June 6th.
Thanks Defectu tui omnis iam = your failure is always present 11:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

98.180.13.138

What do you think about this (Ip 98.180.13.138 edits it, like here and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mine_Run&diff=prev&oldid=432242154 here).Volga2 (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is bad when people make these subtle, but substantive changes that sometimes escape notice. I caught two of these on my own, but missed the Bull Run change, which I just fixed. Thanks. The general rule is that if the casualty figures are cited, someone cannot simply change the numbers without changing the citations in some way. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bukovina

‎ Blanking 35k of material merits at least an edit summary. Replacing English text with another language also deserves an explanation. What gives? RashersTierney (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Thanks for reply at my TP. RashersTierney (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]