User talk:Voila-pourquoi

hersfold helped me out below. i made a few mistakes in moving though, the end result is that everything seems fine nopw, but I created a User talk:Voila-pourquoi2 which is useless and should be deleted.

how do I delete? Voila-pourquoi (talk) 08:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'm starting my first article!! (on the author pamela moore.) it's currently a subpage to my user page. User:Voila-pourquoi/Pamela Moore

I have a few questions on moving forward, hardest is: there is already an entry in wikipedia for a different (living rock musician) pamlea moore. How do I create a "disambiguation" fork?

There is already a reference to this author at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_fiction but it points to the musician (how I realized there was no article about her to begin with)

thanks!

Voila-pourquoi (talk) 07:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start on that article! What you can do is "move" the subpage you've created to Pamela Moore (author) - this will set it apart from the musician, whom we'll let keep the basic title of Pamela Moore since she is more notable. To do this, click on the small "move" tab at the top of your subpage, type in the new title exactly as I have it in my second sentence (actually, you may want to copy and paste it), and submit the form. Then you can go to the Pamela Moore article and add {{The|author by the same name|author}} (without the "nowiki" tags) to the very top, just under the "BLP unsourced" notice. You can also fix the link in Lesbian fiction then as well.

If you run into any problems, don't hesitate to let us know! Again, well done, and happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 07:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pamela Moore (author) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://marbletea.blogspot.com/2007/08/chocolates-for-breakfast.html, http://marbletea.blogspot.com/2007/08/chocolates-for-breakfast.html (redirect from http://marbletea.blogspot.com/2007/08/chocolates-for-breakfast.html)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Limbic resonance

On June 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Limbic resonance, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Awadewit 14:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Orgasm, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK₀₀₄ 00:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry folks, I'm just trying to correct a reference in the 3rd paragraph, inadvertently deleted what came after. Voila-pourquoi (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orgasmic Meditation

I have added some links to sources on the article's talk page. These may be used to find more references. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orgasmic Meditation

I am sorry if you feel consensus had not been reached, as it appeared to me that it had. The only process I'm aware of for meditation is to discuss it on the OneTaste talk page, where consensus seems to have already been reached?

If you wish to restore the Orgasmic Meditation article, simply go there and undo my edit which created a redirect to OneTaste.

Merely out of curiosity, are you a member of the OneTaste group? You seem very knowledgeable on the subject and related subjects such as this.

P.S. Claire is in fact not my name but the name of my partner! lol. Claireislovely (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Orgasmic meditation.

For the Mediation Committee, Seddon ^talk and Xavexgoem (talk) 03:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Your Contribution to Dakini Talk page

Thanks for your contribution to the Dakini talk page. Agree with you that the citations are pretty poor and need fixing.I have some books that may give quotes or or refs to fix some of the problems you mentioned. However, I'm visually impaired and the names of the reference sites are long and difficult for me to link to the sources. Any chance you could contribute by giving the in text citation number for the references you'd like me to take a look at? I'm not on Wikipedia so often these days so if you left them on my talk page there's a better chance of me getting to see them. Regards --Dakinijones (talk) 23:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I'll copy this conversation on your page to keep it all in one place

the citations that do not meet RS criteria are: 2, 3,5,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16, 17, 18 (can't cite wikipedia as source) 20, 21 22, 23. Perhaps a simpler way of explaining it is that the only sources that DO meet the criteria are 1 and 4, the book published by Shambala and possibly 6 --though Inner Traditions does not seem to be a peer reviewed publisher with independent verification of their titles. I'm putting a link to this conversation on the article talk page so others can follow as well.Voila-pourquoi (talk) 00:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]