User talk:Vocalrebellion
Speedy deletion nomination of Urban soul orchestra
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Urban soul orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jujutacular (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Urban soul orchestra, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.Jujutacular (talk) 17:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Urban_soul_orchestra, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TRL (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Urban_soul_orchestra, you will be blocked from editing. TRL (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 15:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Vocalrebellion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not vandalizing! We got a third party to come in and write our wikipedia page, because you said you would delete it if we did not change it. After it had been written and posted, Stephen Hussey read it and said he did not think it accurately reflected who the Urban Soul Orchestra is or what it does, and has an issue with the section on Nitin Sawhney, and wanted it to be taken down immediately to avoid legal issues, which would be a very big problem for us. We would like the page to be pulled down until there is a version that is suitable to be put up. I tried to edit out the parts that he has the most issue with but they kept saying I was vandalizing, and now you have blocked all of us from wikipedia. We have never vandalized anything else, and you even wanted to take down the site YOURSELVES yesterday, and now we want to take out 2 paragraphs and you blocked us. There may be legal and personal ramifications for what is on the site, please take it down immediately until further notice and unblock our address
Decline reason:
Per the no legal threats policy. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vocalrebellion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is absolutely ridiculous. Wikipedia is disrespecting us and our staff. As it is our organization we can choose to take down the site if it has information that we do not want on there - this is slanderous and may have serious consequences for our organization if our partners are unhappy with what has been placed up there. Please unblock our address and allow us to change the parts that we wish to remove AND/OR REMOVE THE ENTIRE SITE IMMEDIATELY and we will get someone to re-write it and post it again later.
Decline reason:
Legal threats are not a good unblock avenue. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.