User talk:Vnessalas
| This user is a student editor in UCLA/Radical_Women_in_Latin_American_Art_(Winter) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Vnessalas, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Yeni & Nan
[edit]Hi! I've changed it up for you! Just make sure that you source this well - it looks like they're definitely notable. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Yeni and Nan) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Yeni and Nan.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Yeni and Nan. Note that other editors have raised some issues about the article's quality. Follow the links in the notice at the top of the page for pointers.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! I saw that your page was moved and that one of the notes was that there was a lot of detail to the page. Something you can do with this is to try to gauge how much is needed to give a general overview of the duo. It may be good to review articles on other persons to see how their articles are written and formatted. Here are some general notes I have:
- Be careful of terms like "best known", as that will be subjective to the reader. Some may know someone best for one thing while another person may say that a different thing is what they're best known for. Be cautious of subjective terminology in general - make sure that when you're describing something that you're only summarizing the source material and that you aren't describing something from your point of view. In other words, if I describe something from my point of view it's subjective and also likely to be my own original research. If I summarize the sourcing and attribute the claims within if they appear to be subjective to that individual (ie, "Jane states that the art is indicative of.."), then that will resolve many concerns as far as details and claims go. This is especially important when it comes to comparing and contrasting things - only compare one thing against another if it's explicitly done in the source material. If this hasn't been done, then we can't make these comparisons.
- I hope that these notes help! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)