User talk:Vmarkovna

Welcome!

Hello, Vmarkovna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from João Teixeira de Faria without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rsjaffe, no content was removed of relevance to present day; content was restructured to bring to light new fact in relevance essential to honor a human being to present day's time.

The previous version pre rewrite is criminal malice targeting a human being in criminal persecution. Edits create neutrality to not put death to a human being's biography in which he was targeted in criminal malice. All edits intended to clarify biography of person for acceptance in non hate speech and non criminal malice to a human being's life. Not a single positive fact was written on previous version written, all written in hate with criminal malice targeting this human being. Such is sufficient for this human being to commit suicide and take his own life as his enemies formulated hate speech through this biography of criminal malice to put a human being to death on account.

This edit creates acceptance and neutrality with new fact, written by an attorney for the welfare of life of this human being for new fact to be known in light of previous written.

I am an attorney in human rights safeguarding a human being's life with this edit. I would appreciate the restructure of the article, all new within article in the whole article to stay published to honor a human being's life with no criminal malice toward him.

I appreciate very much, dear Rsjaffe for your understanding. Thank you for your note. If you have any otherf questions, please let me know.

Victoria Markovna

Attorney in Human Rights

www.victoriamarkovnaesq.com Vmarkovna (talk) 22:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete substantiated information. If you have new information to add to the article and you have the reliable references to support it, then go ahead and do that. See WP:PROOF for more detail.

In your draft autobiography you mention that you're an attorney in the US and US Supreme Court barred. Can you confirm that you are "barred with the US Supreme Court"? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The previous version calls this human being in title a convicted sex offender, he has been released upon no fault. The edits are necessary to correct fact.

I have a barrment certificate from the US Supreme Court. How would you like to receive it? I can email. Vmarkovna (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss your edits before you do them on the talk page for the article, as the edits are controversial and will need to be reviewed. As to the USSC, never mind. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will write on the edits in depth on the talk page for the article.

In the meantime, can you please publish Draft, Victoria Markovna? It has been edited and needs to be published. Vmarkovna (talk) 23:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not on the review group. Be patient, you submitted it for review. In the meantime, make sure that every statement that could be challenged is properly supported by a reliable source, and pay attention to notability requirements for biographies. See WP:RS and WP:BIO. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 22:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vmarkovna If you want to discuss this, please use the talk page for the article to provide evidence for your proposed changes. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is necessary in light of new fact; previous version criminal malice; all content restructured in light of new fact; Edits create neutrality to not put death to a human being's biography in which he was targeted in criminal malice. All edits intended to clarify biography of person for acceptance in non hate speech and non criminal malice to a human being's life. This edit creates acceptance and neutrality with new fact, restructuring all previous content in neutral and objective light.

The previous version pre rewrite is criminal malice targeting a human being in criminal persecution. Edits create neutrality to not put death to a human being's biography in which he was targeted in criminal malice. All edits intended to clarify biography of person for acceptance in non hate speech and non criminal malice to a human being's life. Not a single positive fact was written on previous version written, all written in hate with criminal malice targeting this human being. Such is sufficient for this human being to commit suicide and take his own life as his enemies formulated hate speech through this biography of criminal malice to put a human being to death on account.

He is labelled a convicted sex offender in title to previous. THIS REQUIRES IMMEDIATE CHANGE. Please revert all changes. They are not only constructive, but necessary.

Respectfully,

Victoria Markovna,

Attorney, United States Supreme Court Vmarkovna (talk) 23:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lede in the draft you created about yourself states "best known for representing João Teixeira de Faria and securing his release from prison".

There is an inherent conflict of interest there to be editing his article while also legally representing him, it is best to cease editing pages you are linked to regardless whether you think changes are necessary (suggesting edits through the talk page would be more appropriate with a COI). R0paire-wiki (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Talk: João Teixeira de Faria could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vmarkova legal threats. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vmarkovna. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Vmarkovna, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Markovna (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. The draft can be edited and resubmitted provided the issues have been resolved.

As long as your account is blocked from editing, you may not edit the draft. This includes editing without logging in, as the block applies to you as a person.

bonadea contributions talk 05:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock of Wikipedia Page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vmarkovna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked inadvertently. I am a first time user and would never mean to make what were labelled “disruptive edits.” There was a page with hate crime on it that necessitated revamp. The editors opposed my edits as disruptive. These edits were necessary to not have hate crime in labeling a human being to his grave. The talk page for the article discussed a do-over for this page due to criminal bias and I tried my hardest to fix a page contested. I am very sorry for the misunderstanding. I have never edited another page, this was my first try. Please forgive the misunderstanding and allow back to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You appear to have a conflict of interest in regard to this biography. Your edits removed well sourced content, and replaced it with unsourced content. What do you want to edit, if unblocked? If you want to edit topics where you do not have a conflict of interest, the block could be changed to just this biography. I am not promising anything, but you could propose that, which in my humble opinion would have more chance of being accepted than repeating this unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user has a WP:COI for both the article about them and the article of João Teixeira de Faria (where the hint at WP:LEGAL was). R0paire-wiki (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Limit Block To Own Biography

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vmarkovna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was under impression that you could still make edits with a conflict of interest. Please limit block to my own biography. I am a new user. Please give leeway for new users to become familiarized with Wikipedia fresh.

Decline reason:

The ANI thread that precipitated the block indicates a number of different concerns that you'll need to address before you can be unblocked. First off, you need to retract all legal threats, which means addressing the specific statements identified by R0paire-wiki in that discussion as opposed to denying having made any threats. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any partial block should definitely include João Teixeira de Faria. PhilKnight (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]