User talk:Vklimko

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Mhankiny (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Hello Vklimko, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Vklimko, good luck, and have fun. --Dawnseeker2000 01:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: Online trading external links

Hi, I was thinking in terms of article development, and what it would be like if those articles became featured articles. Would the links be allowed to stay with a featured article review? I'm not sure they would. So that's why I thought I'd removed them. No harm intended. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 01:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genius Inside

Hi Vklimko, as this article has already been deleted, it can't got through WP:AFC for creation. To get this restored to article space you'll have to go through a WP:DRV, explaining that it was deleted and that you have a draft you'd like restored. That being said, I think more work on the draft needs to be done. It seems to heavily depend on blogs and sites run by the company itself, which are not WP:RS. This may cause it to be rejected at DRV. You're free to apply there any time though. Let me know if you have any questions, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Persistant Genius Inside Software Inc. Promotion

http://.geniusinside.com

Accounts

Rbernard84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)

Vklimko (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)

Jessejames1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Mhankiny (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Salamat78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)

fr:Special:Contributions/Salamat78

98.207.131.169 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
69.70.118.46 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for spamming inappropriate external links or self-promotion, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will also have their websites blacklisted.

--Hu12 (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vklimko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe user Hu12 has personal issue with my contribution. I have no intentions of spamming or link farming. My contributions help keep Genius Inside information up to date so that users of wikipedia can benefit from it which they cant right now since the listing was remove and my account has been blocked because I was regular contributor. I do not use multiple accounts, there might be someone other users of wikipedia in our company therefore multiple account abuse should be removed as well. There are many complaints about Hu12 that have been made against this user and his/her admin rights should be reviewed. Vklimko (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your contributions do not appear to include anything other than promotional edits for your employer and links to sites you own. I see no problem with Hu12's actions. Kuru (talk) 00:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeah, no. Most of those complaints are likely from spammers who don't like the fact that Hu12 works at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist (which is a thankless task in and of itself). He's one of our best administrators in the area, so it only makes sense he's torqued off spammers a lot. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]