User talk:Vkilmer02
| This user is a student editor in Gonzaga_University/COML_509:_Social_Media_Engagement_and_Analysis_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Vkilmer02, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review for "Anonymous social media."
[edit]Article Evaluation Section: Your contributions in adding more relevant and recent data is a good way to contribute to an existing article. I believe that as much recent data as possible make the content of the article a lot stronger. Not sure if the "Like or dislike a video" source is in fact a strong source for this type of article, as it focuses directly on Youtube videos rather than overall and general social media platforms. Maybe with a great connection to the overall subject of the article this section could be efficiently incorporated. Moeniagt (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Drafted Contributions Section:
Changing "functionality" to "function" is a great grammatical contribution, which in the overall article makes it appear a lot more professional. Adding the comma after "1999" is also a good grammatical move. Moeniagt (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Degrees of anonymity Section:
As you make contributions to this article and change the wording in some of the content, I noticed that the sentence you are referring too might also need some clarity. "While they still remain anonymous, some of these sites can sync up with the use" in this sentence maybe the word "they" need to be clearly identified as who "they" is. Also, not sure if it's really necessary to take out "have the ability to" and change it to "can" is really necessary. I believe your contribution makes the sentence shorter, I also believe both ways could work in the article content. Moeniagt (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Controversy Section:
Adding commas and other grammatical errors is an extraordinary move. I also like your idea of adding "After School" and updating the sentences. I think the way you have updated the sentence actually makes the content more neural and leads to a good subject. Moeniagt (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Perspective Users Section:
Updating the sentences and taking some extra words from the article, again displays a more professional and neutral article. I think you have done an amazing job with these changes. Moeniagt (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Overall: All of your contributions are powerful and make the article more relevant, neutral, professional. I also like your vision with future changes in adding more current data to make the article a lot more relevant and strong. Editing an article is time consuming and a huge job. I believe that you have an extraordinary in reviewing and editing this article. I think the sources you plan on using are also resourceful, although I am not completely sure about the "Like or dislike a video", the others I do believe can be used powerfully and efficiently. Moeniagt (talk)