User talk:Vk2010

April 2010

Your addition to Richard T. Snodgrass has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 16:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the biography section you added since it seemed to be a direct copy of the content found at [1]. Due to legal issues we cannot accept content from other sites unless the content is licensed under CC-BY-SA or more lenient terms. Since the main page of the arizona.edu website lists states reserved i removed the content. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard T. Snodgrass

A tag has been placed on Richard T. Snodgrass requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have been warned twice previously not to post copyrighted material from other websites without permission. Please do not continue to do so. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please let me edit the document? You are trying to edit is as I am making the changes.

AfD nomination of Richard T. Snodgrass

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Richard T. Snodgrass. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard T. Snodgrass. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]