User talk:Vizcarra/September 2005

Extending a hand

Vizcarra, from your old page listing my comments as being part of a cabal with other users[1], plus your recent comments in Talk:Zionism (intervening against me when every other editor mentioned the other user in the dispute as acting belligerently), I gather that you feel I am somehow acting unfairly or otherwise against you (as you said: "Also, it seems that the "regulars" who agree on a determined number of POV seem to stick together anyway, so I'm doing it to balance the discussion."). I really would like to resolve this, because I don't think this sort of antagonism is productive. My interest in Jewish topics (which is only a section of my interests) are certainly shared with other editors, but I am not part of any coordinated effort to push a POV, and I am in no way related to the other editors. My only disagreement with you that I know of was on the issue of Passion Plays in the anti-Semitism article. I thought you were wrong, and I tried to prove it with my sources, but was unable to convince you of my point. I have had no other interaction with you than that, and I am not sure why it seemed so antagonistic to you. If I in any way insulted you in that exchange, I apologize, but I would appreciate it if we could bury the hachet here and move forward. We are likely to continue to disagree, but I would prefer it to be productive and not destructive. Work for you? Goodoldpolonius2 23:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess your reply makes your position clear. Ah, well. --Goodoldpolonius2 00:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vizcarra, I still don't agree with your points, but our back-and-forth is not terribly productive, though, if you'd like, we can continue the debate started on my Talk page and I can reply in detail to all of your points. Failing that, I am not sure how to start over with you however, since I don't think I am incorrect about my interpretation of events and facts, and I know you also think you are in the right, even if I disagree. Can we indeed bury the hatchet on the discussions to date, and try to work together more harmoniously in the future? --Goodoldpolonius2 23:22, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vizcarra, fair enough on your points on my page, lets move forward. My request is that you similarly assume good faith from me. --Goodoldpolonius2 00:26, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I,

V. Molotov

, hereby give you this barnstar for excellent work on the Spanish Profanity article.

Take care,

V. Molotov

14:45, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your kind words, things like this give me the will to keep trying to make WP better. --Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 17:12, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

200.45.178.153

I guess we're tag teaming him with the test. :) (See talk page) :)

--Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 20:11, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't want to rv him/her, since the article actually reads better now. :)

--Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 20:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Hey, Vizcarra. A belated thanks for your comments on the Zionism:talk page. I am also currently tangling with a couple of your old friends at Occupied Territories. Specifically, Jayjg has been reverting my changes, and SlimVirgin joined him on at least one occasion. With apologies for bothering you with this, could I recruit you to make a revert on occasion if this ridiculousness continues? Thanks in any case. (For your amusement, you might note that Jayjg had violated 3RR until he reverted his last, revert.) Marsden 17:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Municipalities of Baja California

Hi Vizcarra. I'm working on the slow process of creating an article for every Mexican municipality (it'll take forever, but oh, well) and I came across your map Image:Bajamunicipios.PNG. I'm thinking of being bold and modify it in order to make all maps about Mexico consistent (e.g. similar to the maps of the states and boroughs of the Federal District). I just thought of letting you know and hope you don't mind. Cheers. -- Rune Welsh ταλκ 18:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Canales not Elizondo

Hello!.... current secretary of energy is Fernando Canales Clariond NOT Fernando Elizondo Barragán as you just updated. Anyway, i have already updated both bios.

cheers, Abögarp